Jump to content

Talk:The Littlest Rebel: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Line 2: Line 2:
{{Film|American-task-force=yes|class=start|War-task-force=yes}}
{{Film|American-task-force=yes|class=start|War-task-force=yes}}


== Undue Weight Given to Modern "Racism" Claims Makes This Article Non-POV ==
== Undue Weight Given to Modern "Racism" Claims Makes This Article Non-POV Neutral ==


You just had to do it, didn't you, Wikipedia? I suppose citing contemporary reviews under the "Critical reception" heading wasn't sufficient, because finding a negative contemporary review that supported the "racist" POV agenda was either much too hard, or impossible to find. But then you had to go even further by including TWO modern, negative reviews citing "racism" and "stereotypes" in order to give them undue weight against the ONE positive, contemporary review which no doubt more fairly represents the consensus of the public's reception (both black and white) at the time this film was originally released. Well... So much for your claim that Wikipedia articles must adhere to the principle of a "Neutral Point of View". Shameful. Absolutely shameful. [[Special:Contributions/68.228.136.13|68.228.136.13]] ([[User talk:68.228.136.13|talk]]) 00:01, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
You just had to do it, didn't you, Wikipedia? I suppose citing contemporary reviews under the "Critical reception" heading wasn't sufficient, because finding a negative contemporary review that supported the "racist" POV agenda was either much too hard, or impossible to find. But then you had to go even further by including TWO modern, negative reviews citing "racism" and "stereotypes" in order to give them undue weight against the ONE positive, contemporary review which no doubt more fairly represents the consensus of the public's reception (both black and white) at the time this film was originally released. Well... So much for your claim that Wikipedia articles must adhere to the principle of a "Neutral Point of View". Shameful. Absolutely shameful. [[Special:Contributions/68.228.136.13|68.228.136.13]] ([[User talk:68.228.136.13|talk]]) 00:01, 28 February 2017 (UTC)

Revision as of 02:00, 28 February 2017

WikiProject iconFilm: War / American Start‑class
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.
StartThis article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by the War films task force.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by the American cinema task force.

Undue Weight Given to Modern "Racism" Claims Makes This Article Non-POV Neutral

You just had to do it, didn't you, Wikipedia? I suppose citing contemporary reviews under the "Critical reception" heading wasn't sufficient, because finding a negative contemporary review that supported the "racist" POV agenda was either much too hard, or impossible to find. But then you had to go even further by including TWO modern, negative reviews citing "racism" and "stereotypes" in order to give them undue weight against the ONE positive, contemporary review which no doubt more fairly represents the consensus of the public's reception (both black and white) at the time this film was originally released. Well... So much for your claim that Wikipedia articles must adhere to the principle of a "Neutral Point of View". Shameful. Absolutely shameful. 68.228.136.13 (talk) 00:01, 28 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]