Jump to content

Talk:Winsorizing: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Assessment: Statistics: class=Start (assisted)
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
{{WikiProject Statistics |class=Start |importance=low}}
{{WikiProject Statistics |class=Start |importance=low}}

== Python code example ==

Are we sure that the Python code example is relevant here? It seems out of place between a toy example of winsorizing and the concept of trimming. Also, describing an algorithm instead of showing a built-in function in a specific Python library might be more instructive. It would be enough to mention that there exist built-in functions for this in multiple programming languages (Python, R, possibly also others).


== Title ==
== Title ==

Revision as of 12:25, 7 March 2017

WikiProject iconStatistics Start‑class Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Statistics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of statistics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
StartThis article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

Python code example

Are we sure that the Python code example is relevant here? It seems out of place between a toy example of winsorizing and the concept of trimming. Also, describing an algorithm instead of showing a built-in function in a specific Python library might be more instructive. It would be enough to mention that there exist built-in functions for this in multiple programming languages (Python, R, possibly also others).

Title

Winsorizing or Winsorising? I think the choice should be consistent with the article Winsorized mean. Btyner (talk) 21:35, 30 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I think the MOS says that the original variant of English that an article was written in is the one to continue using, which favours winsorising. Personally I use -ise not -ize but the global tide is probably against me and countries where this is still common. Tayste (edits) 00:03, 12 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

references

Where in the Hastings, Mosteller, Winsor paper, Winsorization concept as described in this article is intoduced? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 130.225.98.200 (talk) 13:34, 21 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]