User talk:TheDragonFire

Not sure if I am contacting you correctly, this is my first article on Wikipedia.

My article about "Lil Cory" has been tagged for deletion again even though I have added credible sources and cites my information.

This artist has performed in television. Someone posted on my talk page that they did a search on this artist and that all they saw was social media. The person who said this is not looking in the right places.

Francesco Mariotti

Hello, regarding the article Francesco Mariotti, you tagged it as BLPunsourced. The article does have a list of sources, but no inline citations. I replaced your tag with the correct tag (no footnotes). Please always look down through the entire article before assuming there are no sources. Thank you. Antonioatrylia (talk) 05:48, 18 March 2017 (UTC)

@Antonioatrylia: Hey! I'm sorry about that. I think I scrolled down and saw "External links", and assumed that was all there was, completely missing "Sources". I've re-checked the page, and noticed a possible copyright violation, which I've tagged. There still seems to be non-infringing content, so I didn't speedy it. TheDragonFire (talk) 03:38, 19 March 2017 (UTC)

Fidha Hussain

The user, Fidha Hussain has made a string of harmful edits to Wikipedia, most seemingly in good faith, but some seem obviously malicious to me (such as the move of Wikipedia:Images). You seem aware of the user, and I was wondering what you think. Should Fidha be reported to an admin? Psychotic Spartan 123 06:35, 19 March 2017 (UTC)

@PsychoticSpartan123: Hey! I've warned the user about their move of Wikipedia:Images. Based on some of their created articles, I suspect it's more a lack of competence, rather than malicious intent. Please feel free to monitor the user, and report to WP:AIV after a level 4 warning. In cleaning up the users attempt to move their user page to the Wikipedia namespace, I've left CSD templates on the redirects which which should draw sufficient admin attention at this time. TheDragonFire (talk) 06:44, 19 March 2017 (UTC)

Kumar Iyer

Hi I am very new to wiki. you have just deleted my page on Kumar Iyer. Can I start afresh and try to create a page on same topic with different/fresh content? Rish1m (talk) 05:29, 21 March 2017 (UTC)

@Rish1m: Hi! Please go to Wikipedia:Articles for creation and follow the process there. As I said on your talk page, you tried to contact Rick but ended up recreating the article page with no relevant content. TheDragonFire (talk) 06:14, 21 March 2017 (UTC)

좋은 날!

Please explain change to template @ 38th Air Defense Artillery Brigade. It won't be there long. Did it offend you?— Preceding unsigned comment added by StephenTS42 (talk • contribs) 13:58, 22 March 2017 (UTC)

Please...before making any changes! Comment

There are reasons things are the way they are. I welcome all and any improvements, and I hope you will also. Sudden unexplained changes to an article can be jarring to a reader as well as editors. I don't know everything, but I do know its best to be courteous first than to be bold. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by StephenTS42 (talk • contribs) 14:15, 22 March 2017 (UTC)

@StephenTS42: I edited the {{under construction}} template, as you had incorrectly inserted your signature into the placedby parameter, rather than just your username, and this was detected by a WP:CHECKWIKI scan. I fixed this, and removed the image that was not displaying correctly within the box. You are very welcome to replace the image if you wish. I additionally ran WP:REFILL on the article and replaced one bare citation. I would encourage you to read WP:BOLD and WP:OWNERSHIP. Specifically, uncontroversial changes, such as fixing a template error and filling out a citation do not have to be discussed first. I welcome any and all feedback regarding the content of my (very minor) changes, but reverting them simply because I did not discuss them first is inappropriate. Looking at the article's talk page, this does not appear to be the first time this has happened. TheDragonFire (talk) 00:58, 23 March 2017 (UTC)

Well, at least you looked at the talk page. I thank you for your much needed comments. I will try to accomodate your requests as best I can. You are welcome to contribute to the article if you can. I would like to point out that the article is currently under peer review, and as such needs my focus-- reckless as it seems. I apologize for any inconvenience this may cause. Nonetheless, it would appear better on my part to step aside for awhile and simmer down. Thank you once again!——→StephenTS42 (talk) 09:49, 23 March 2017 (UTC)