Jobs and Growth Act: Difference between revisions
Rescuing 1 sources and tagging 0 as dead. #IABot (v1.3beta8) |
|||
| Line 161: | Line 161: | ||
{{quote|The old way of deciding whether there could be privatization of these lands was that you had to have a double majority. You had to have majority of those who voted, and of those in the community, which is not unreasonable given low voting levels. What the government did was [to establish] that now 20 or 30 people, if they’re the only ones who voted out of a thousand, can decide the issue.|[[Paul Martin]]<ref name=Martin />}} |
{{quote|The old way of deciding whether there could be privatization of these lands was that you had to have a double majority. You had to have majority of those who voted, and of those in the community, which is not unreasonable given low voting levels. What the government did was [to establish] that now 20 or 30 people, if they’re the only ones who voted out of a thousand, can decide the issue.|[[Paul Martin]]<ref name=Martin />}} |
||
[[Idle No More]] is a protest movement formed in reaction to Bill C-45 (Division 8 of Part 4) and other concerns regarding indigenous [[treaty rights]].<ref>{{cite web| |
[[Idle No More]] is a protest movement formed in reaction to Bill C-45 (Division 8 of Part 4) and other concerns regarding indigenous [[treaty rights]].<ref>{{cite web|title=History of Idle No More |date=December 23, 2012 |url=http://idlenomore1.blogspot.ca/p/background-on-idle-no-more.html |accessdate=2013-01-18 |deadurl=yes |archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20130113101803/http://idlenomore1.blogspot.ca/p/background-on-idle-no-more.html |archivedate=January 13, 2013 |df= }}</ref> |
||
Political scientist Tom Flanagan, who worked as advisor to [[Stephen Harper]] until 2004, argued that the modifications to voting and approval procedures in relation to proposed land designations in the Indian Act in (Division 8 of Part 4) would speed up approvals which would be advantageous to First Nations that want to lease portions of their reserves for shopping centres, industrial parks, residential developments, casinos, etc.<ref name=Flanagan-land-designation>{{cite news |author=Tom Flanagan|authorlink = Tom Flanagan (political scientist) |date=December 29, 2012 |title =Bill C-45 simply makes it easier for first nations to lease land |newspaper=The Globe and Mail |location=Toronto, ON |accessdate=2013-09-12|url=http://www.theglobeandmail.com/commentary/bill-c-45-simply-makes-it-easier-for-first-nations-to-lease-land/article6780103/}}</ref> Under the Indian Act changes to land designation for leasing "had to be approved by majority vote in a referendum or band meeting for which the quorum was a majority of members – in other words, approval by a majority of a majority. If, as usually happened, the quorum was not achieved, the Minister of Aboriginal Affairs could authorize a second meeting dispensing with the quorum." Flanagan argued that this two-stage process was both costly and time consuming.<ref name=Flanagan-land-designation /> |
Political scientist Tom Flanagan, who worked as advisor to [[Stephen Harper]] until 2004, argued that the modifications to voting and approval procedures in relation to proposed land designations in the Indian Act in (Division 8 of Part 4) would speed up approvals which would be advantageous to First Nations that want to lease portions of their reserves for shopping centres, industrial parks, residential developments, casinos, etc.<ref name=Flanagan-land-designation>{{cite news |author=Tom Flanagan|authorlink = Tom Flanagan (political scientist) |date=December 29, 2012 |title =Bill C-45 simply makes it easier for first nations to lease land |newspaper=The Globe and Mail |location=Toronto, ON |accessdate=2013-09-12|url=http://www.theglobeandmail.com/commentary/bill-c-45-simply-makes-it-easier-for-first-nations-to-lease-land/article6780103/}}</ref> Under the Indian Act changes to land designation for leasing "had to be approved by majority vote in a referendum or band meeting for which the quorum was a majority of members – in other words, approval by a majority of a majority. If, as usually happened, the quorum was not achieved, the Minister of Aboriginal Affairs could authorize a second meeting dispensing with the quorum." Flanagan argued that this two-stage process was both costly and time consuming.<ref name=Flanagan-land-designation /> |
||
Revision as of 07:40, 23 April 2017
 | This article may lend undue weight to certain ideas, incidents, or controversies. (January 2013) |
| Jobs and Growth Act, 2012[1] | |
|---|---|
| |
| Assented to | December 14, 2012[1] |
| Legislative history | |
| Introduced by | Jim Flaherty, Minister of Finance[1] |
| First reading | October 18, 2012[1] |
| Second reading | October 30, 2012[1] |
| Third reading | December 5, 2012[1] |
| Committee report | November 26, 2012[1] |
The Jobs and Growth Act, 2012[2] (informally referred to as Bill C-45) is an Act of the Parliament of Canada. It was passed in December 2012 from the second omnibus bill introduced by the Conservative government to implement its 2012 budget,[3] following the passage of the Jobs, Growth and Long-term Prosperity Act in June 2012.[4] Both bills attracted controversy both for their size (>450 pages each) and for the breadth of provisions contained that were not fiscally related.
Content of Bill
| Part | Division | Heading | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| Part 1 | Amendments to the Income Tax Act and related regulations | Implements certain income tax measures and related measures proposed in the March 29, 2012 budget | |
| Part 2 | Measures in respect of sales tax | Amends the Excise Tax Act and the Jobs and Economic Growth Act to implement rules applicable to the financial services sector in respect of the goods and services tax and harmonized sales tax (GST/HST) | |
| Part 3 | Federal-Provincial Fiscal Arrangements Act | Amends the Act to provide the legislative authority to share with provinces and territories, and also allows the Minister of Finance to request from the Minister of National Revenue information that is necessary for the administration of the sharing of taxes with the provinces and territories. | |
| Part 4 | 1 | Financial institutions | Amends various Acts to allow certain public sector investment pools to directly invest in a federally regulated financial institution |
| 2 | Shipping | Amends the Canada Shipping Act, 2001 to permit the incorporation by reference into regulations of all Canadian modifications to an international convention or industry standard that are also incorporated by reference into the regulations | |
| 3 | Preserving the stability and strength of Canada's financial sector | Amends the Canada Deposit Insurance Corporation Act to provide for a limited, automatic stay in respect of certain eligible financial contracts when a bridge institution is established. It also amends the Payment Clearing and Settlement Act to facilitate central clearing of standardized over-the-counter derivatives. | |
| 4 | Fisheries | Amends the Fisheries Act to amend the prohibition against obstructing the passage of fish and to provide that certain amounts are to be paid into the Environmental Damages Fund. It also amends the Jobs, Growth and Long-term Prosperity Act to amend the definition of Aboriginal fishery and another prohibition relating to the passage of fish. Finally, it provides transitional provisions relating to authorizations issued under the Fisheries Act before certain amendments to that Act come into force | |
| 5 | Bridge to Strengthen Trade Act | Provides for the construction of a bridge spanning the Detroit River, and excludes the application of certain other Acts. | |
| 6 | Bretton Woods and Related Agreements Act | To reflect changes made to the Articles of Agreement of the International Monetary Fund as a result of the 2010 Quota and Governance Reforms | |
| 7 | Canada Pension Plan | To implement the results of the 2010-12 triennial review | |
| 8 | Indian Act | Amends the Act to modify the voting and approval procedures in relation to proposed land designations. | |
| 9 | Judges Act | To implement the Government of Canada’s response to the report of the fourth Judicial Compensation and Benefits Commission regarding salary and benefits for federally appointed judges | |
| 10 | Canada Labour Code | Various amendments relating to the calculation of holiday pay, the timelines for handling Part III complaints, and limits on periods to be covered by payment orders. | |
| 11 | Merchant Seamen Compensation Act | To transfer the powers and duties of the Merchant Seamen Compensation Board to the Minister of Labour and to repeal provisions that are related to the Board. | |
| 12 | Customs Act | To strengthen and streamline procedures related to arrivals in Canada, to clarify the obligations of owners or operators of international transport installations to maintain port of entry facilities and to allow the Minister of Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness to require prescribed information about any person who is or is expected to be on board a conveyance. | |
| 13 | Hazardous Materials Information Review Act | To transfer the powers and functions of the Hazardous Materials Information Review Commission to the Minister of Health and to repeal provisions of that Act that are related to the Commission. | |
| 14 | Agreement on Internal Trade Implementation Act | It provides primarily for the enforceability of orders to pay tariff costs and monetary penalties made under Chapter 17, and also repeals subsection 28(3) of the Crown Liability and Proceedings Act. | |
| 15 | Employment Insurance Act | Amends the Act to provide a temporary measure to refund a portion of employer premiums for small businesses. An employer whose premiums were $10,000 or less in 2011 will be refunded the increase in 2012 premiums over those paid in 2011, to a maximum of $1,000. | |
| 16 | Immigration and Refugee Protection Act | To provide for an electronic travel authorization and to provide that the User Fees Act does not apply to a fee for the provision of services in relation to an application for an electronic travel authorization. | |
| 17 | Canada Mortgage and Housing Corporation Act | To remove the age limit for persons from outside the federal public administration being appointed or continuing as President or as a director of the Corporation. | |
| 18 | Navigable Waters Protection Act | Amends the Act to limit its application to works in certain navigable waters that are set out in its schedule. It also amends that Act so that it can be deemed to apply to certain works in other navigable waters, with the approval of the Minister of Transport. | |
| 19 | Canada Grain Act | To replace the requirement that the operator of a licensed terminal elevator receiving grain cause that grain to be officially weighed and officially inspected by a requirement that the operator either weigh and inspect that grain or cause that grain to be weighed and inspected by a third party, plus other amendments | |
| 20 | International Interests in Mobile Equipment (Aircraft Equipment) Act | To amend the Act to modify the manner in which certain international obligations are implemented. | |
| 21 | Canadian Environmental Assessment Act, 2012 | Various technical amendments to the Act | |
| 22 | Canada Employment Insurance Financing Board | Provides for the temporary suspension of the Canada Employment Insurance Financing Board Act and the dissolution of the Canada Employment Insurance Financing Board. | |
| 23 | Public Sector Pensions | Amends various Acts with respect to contribution rates. | |
| 24 | Canada Revenue Agency Act | Makes s. 112 of the Public Service Labour Relations Act (entering into a collective agreement is subject to the Governor in Council’s approval) applicable to the Canada Revenue Agency. | |
Reaction to Navigable Waters Protection Act changes
"The most contentious amendments to the bill were those to the Navigable Waters Protection Act, which remove thousands of lakes and streams from federal protection under that law. The Conservatives said the changes streamline regulation and remove red tape that held up projects along waterways under the guise that they would impede navigation. Opposition parties say it removes environmental oversight over some of Canada’s most treasured lakes and rivers." [6]
The Green Party argued that Division 18 of Part 4 of Bill C-45 "weakened Canadians’ historic right to navigate the lakes, rivers, and streams of Canada without being impeded by pipelines, bridges, power lines, dams, mining and forestry equipment, and more." They argue that a body of water not mentioned in Schedule 2 on page 424, would no longer be protected from resource development by Canada's first environmental law enacted in 1882, the Navigable Waters Protection Act.[7]
Amnesty International says "changes to the Canadian Environmental Assessment Act, the Fisheries Act, the Navigable Waters Protection Act, and the proposed Safe Drinking Water for First Nations Act have profound implications for the rights of Indigenous peoples as set out in treaties, affirmed in the constitution, and protected by international human rights standards." [8][9]
[F]ederal legislative agenda that goes far beyond the Department of Aboriginal Affairs. Changes to the Canadian Environmental Assessment Act, the Fisheries Act, and the Navigable Waters Act, along with the proposed Safe Drinking Water for First Nations Act, to name only a few examples, all have profound implications for the rights of Indigenous peoples as set out in Treaties, affirmed in the Canadian Constitution, and protected by international human rights standards.
— Amnesty International
Reaction to Indian Act changes
Former Prime Minister Paul Martin argued [10] that the government failed to consult First Nations about this movement towards [privatization] and that the majority of bands were against the change to voting procedures. Martin stated that there was no debate either in parliament or with First Nations on this issue that "the bands themselves must decide." He denounced the way in which it was "simply slipped it into a budget bill."[10]
The old way of deciding whether there could be privatization of these lands was that you had to have a double majority. You had to have majority of those who voted, and of those in the community, which is not unreasonable given low voting levels. What the government did was [to establish] that now 20 or 30 people, if they’re the only ones who voted out of a thousand, can decide the issue.
Idle No More is a protest movement formed in reaction to Bill C-45 (Division 8 of Part 4) and other concerns regarding indigenous treaty rights.[11]
Political scientist Tom Flanagan, who worked as advisor to Stephen Harper until 2004, argued that the modifications to voting and approval procedures in relation to proposed land designations in the Indian Act in (Division 8 of Part 4) would speed up approvals which would be advantageous to First Nations that want to lease portions of their reserves for shopping centres, industrial parks, residential developments, casinos, etc.[12] Under the Indian Act changes to land designation for leasing "had to be approved by majority vote in a referendum or band meeting for which the quorum was a majority of members – in other words, approval by a majority of a majority. If, as usually happened, the quorum was not achieved, the Minister of Aboriginal Affairs could authorize a second meeting dispensing with the quorum." Flanagan argued that this two-stage process was both costly and time consuming.[12]
External links
- Government of Canada (2012). "C-45: Status of the Bill". LEGISinfo. Retrieved 2013-01-16.
- A second Act to implement certain provisions of the budget tabled in Parliament on March 29, 2012 and other measures, openparliament
- Library of Parliament (2012). "Legislative Summary". Retrieved 2013-01-16.
References
- ^ a b c d e f g h Government of Canada (2012). "C-45: Status of the Bill". LEGISinfo. Retrieved 2013-01-16.
- ^ Jobs and Growth Act, 2012, S.C. 2012, c. 31
- ^ "Bill C-45: What's In Omnibus Budget Bill 2?". Huffington Post. January 18, 2013. Retrieved 2013-01-18.
- ^ Jobs, Growth and Long-term Prosperity Act, S.C. 2012, c. 19
- ^ Library of Parliament (2012). "Legislative Summary". Retrieved 2013-01-16.
- ^ Colin Horgan (December 5, 2012). "Opposition claims moral victory as Conservatives vote down budget bill amendments". Retrieved 2013-01-18.
- ^ Amnesty International (December 28, 2012). "Open Letter Urging a Meeting with Chief Theresa Spence". Retrieved 2013-01-18.
- ^ Trish Hennessy. "Hennessy's Index: A number is never just a number". Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives. Retrieved 2013-01-18.
- ^ a b c Jennifer Clibbon (17 January 2013). "Paul Martin says Ottawa has 'no understanding' of native issues: Former prime minister was the architect of the 2005 Kelowna Accord". CBC.
- ^ "History of Idle No More". December 23, 2012. Archived from the original on January 13, 2013. Retrieved 2013-01-18.
{{cite web}}: Unknown parameter|deadurl=ignored (|url-status=suggested) (help) - ^ a b Tom Flanagan (December 29, 2012). "Bill C-45 simply makes it easier for first nations to lease land". The Globe and Mail. Toronto, ON. Retrieved 2013-09-12.