Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Adrian Țofei (2nd nomination): Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
Pinging {{ping|Somedifferentstuff}}, who authored the first nomination. - [[User:Biruitorul|Biruitorul]] <small><sup>[[User talk:Biruitorul|Talk]]</sup></small> 15:02, 2 May 2017 (UTC) |
Pinging {{ping|Somedifferentstuff}}, who authored the first nomination. - [[User:Biruitorul|Biruitorul]] <small><sup>[[User talk:Biruitorul|Talk]]</sup></small> 15:02, 2 May 2017 (UTC) |
||
The movie's notability hasn't been disputed so far, only Țofei's page. But since he did almost everything on that movie - directing, writing, producing, cinematography, editing, production design, casting, production management, sound, sound editing, color, special effects etc. and a lot of critics praised this achievement (it is actually Romania's first 100% indie/guerrilla feature film), I believe this is also proof of Țofei's notability. I was fascinated myself by the achievement, which is why I tried to contribute as much as possible to both the movie's page and Țofei's page and tag them whenever I see them mentioned elsewhere. It's odd that this behavior is interpreted as a form of abuse or self-promotion. It is not. I am still searching for more info and references to add to Țofei's page in support if its notability, please don't delete it again. |
The movie's notability hasn't been disputed so far, only Țofei's page. But since he did almost everything on that movie - directing, writing, producing, cinematography, editing, production design, casting, production management, sound, sound editing, color, special effects etc. and a lot of critics praised this achievement (it is actually Romania's first 100% indie/guerrilla feature film), I believe this is also proof of Țofei's notability. I was fascinated myself by the achievement, which is why I tried to contribute as much as possible to both the movie's page and Țofei's page and tag them whenever I see them mentioned elsewhere. It's odd that this behavior is interpreted as a form of abuse or self-promotion. It is not. I am still searching for more info and references to add to Țofei's page in support if its notability, please don't delete it again.[[Special:Contributions/86.120.254.110|86.120.254.110]] ([[User talk:86.120.254.110|talk]]) 15:53, 2 May 2017 (UTC) |
||
Revision as of 15:53, 2 May 2017
Adrian Țofei
- Adrian Țofei (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This was just soft-deleted, then restored. It's pretty obvious the IP behind the article is Țofei himself, a relentless self-promoter based on the number of articles where he's seeded this link. The fact, though, is that at present, his sole claim to notability rests on having directed a single film (itself of uncertain notability); that really doesn't appear enough to satisfy WP:BIO.
Pinging @Somedifferentstuff:, who authored the first nomination. - Biruitorul Talk 15:02, 2 May 2017 (UTC)
The movie's notability hasn't been disputed so far, only Țofei's page. But since he did almost everything on that movie - directing, writing, producing, cinematography, editing, production design, casting, production management, sound, sound editing, color, special effects etc. and a lot of critics praised this achievement (it is actually Romania's first 100% indie/guerrilla feature film), I believe this is also proof of Țofei's notability. I was fascinated myself by the achievement, which is why I tried to contribute as much as possible to both the movie's page and Țofei's page and tag them whenever I see them mentioned elsewhere. It's odd that this behavior is interpreted as a form of abuse or self-promotion. It is not. I am still searching for more info and references to add to Țofei's page in support if its notability, please don't delete it again.86.120.254.110 (talk) 15:53, 2 May 2017 (UTC)