User talk:To The Depths In Degradation: Difference between revisions
Appearance
Content deleted Content added
Ad Orientem (talk | contribs) →Wikipedia is For Wankers: disruptive |
No edit summary |
||
Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
---- |
---- |
||
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should read the [[Wikipedia:Guide to appealing blocks|guide to appealing blocks]], then contact administrators by submitting a request to the ''[[Wikipedia:Unblock Ticket Request System|Unblock Ticket Request System]]''. If the block is a [[Wikipedia:Blocking policy#CheckUser blocks|CheckUser]] or [[Wikipedia:Blocking policy#Oversight blocks|Oversight]] block, was made by the Arbitration Committee or to enforce an arbitration decision (arbitration enforcement), or is unsuitable for public discussion, you should appeal to the [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee|Arbitration Committee]].<br><small>Please note that there could be appeals to the [[Wikipedia:Unblock Ticket Request System|unblock ticket request system]] that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.</small><p> [[User:Ad Orientem|Ad Orientem]] ([[User talk:Ad Orientem|talk]]) 01:24, 22 March 2017 (UTC)</div><!-- Template:Blocked talk-revoked-notice --> |
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should read the [[Wikipedia:Guide to appealing blocks|guide to appealing blocks]], then contact administrators by submitting a request to the ''[[Wikipedia:Unblock Ticket Request System|Unblock Ticket Request System]]''. If the block is a [[Wikipedia:Blocking policy#CheckUser blocks|CheckUser]] or [[Wikipedia:Blocking policy#Oversight blocks|Oversight]] block, was made by the Arbitration Committee or to enforce an arbitration decision (arbitration enforcement), or is unsuitable for public discussion, you should appeal to the [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee|Arbitration Committee]].<br><small>Please note that there could be appeals to the [[Wikipedia:Unblock Ticket Request System|unblock ticket request system]] that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.</small><p> [[User:Ad Orientem|Ad Orientem]] ([[User talk:Ad Orientem|talk]]) 01:24, 22 March 2017 (UTC)</div><!-- Template:Blocked talk-revoked-notice --> |
||
It's alright comrade, they can block you, but they cannot block Rolli |
Revision as of 21:21, 15 May 2017
March 2017
Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. If the block is a CheckUser or Oversight block, was made by the Arbitration Committee or to enforce an arbitration decision (arbitration enforcement), or is unsuitable for public discussion, you should appeal to the Arbitration Committee.
Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.
(block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. If the block is a CheckUser or Oversight block, was made by the Arbitration Committee or to enforce an arbitration decision (arbitration enforcement), or is unsuitable for public discussion, you should appeal to the Arbitration Committee.
Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.
It's alright comrade, they can block you, but they cannot block Rolli