User talk:DHeyward: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Sagecandor (talk | contribs) →Edit warring at June 2017 London attacks: new section |
Undid revision 783690861 by Sagecandor (talk) And you're being idiotic. |
||
| Line 50: | Line 50: | ||
You said $10 million is the threshhold for a "major donor" on the Russian interference article talk page. I think it is far less. I don't believe there are more than a dozen individuals who donated more than $1 million. I could be wrong, and would be interested to see any data to the contrary. [[User:SPECIFICO |<font color ="0011FF"> '''SPECIFICO'''</font>]][[User_talk:SPECIFICO | ''talk'']] 23:08, 15 May 2017 (UTC) |
You said $10 million is the threshhold for a "major donor" on the Russian interference article talk page. I think it is far less. I don't believe there are more than a dozen individuals who donated more than $1 million. I could be wrong, and would be interested to see any data to the contrary. [[User:SPECIFICO |<font color ="0011FF"> '''SPECIFICO'''</font>]][[User_talk:SPECIFICO | ''talk'']] 23:08, 15 May 2017 (UTC) |
||
:https://www.opensecrets.org/overview/topindivs.php The top 100 are all above $2 million. Soros on that list was $20 million at number 12. One of the Koch's was $4 million. The other wasn't listed so there are probably other bundling mechanisms. Devos was in the top 100 at $3.2 million. Prince was not in the top 100. --[[User:DHeyward|DHeyward]] ([[User talk:DHeyward#top|talk]]) 00:46, 16 May 2017 (UTC) |
:https://www.opensecrets.org/overview/topindivs.php The top 100 are all above $2 million. Soros on that list was $20 million at number 12. One of the Koch's was $4 million. The other wasn't listed so there are probably other bundling mechanisms. Devos was in the top 100 at $3.2 million. Prince was not in the top 100. --[[User:DHeyward|DHeyward]] ([[User talk:DHeyward#top|talk]]) 00:46, 16 May 2017 (UTC) |
||
== Edit warring at June 2017 London attacks == |
|||
[[File:Stop hand nuvola.svg|30px|left|alt=Stop icon]] Your recent editing history at [[:June 2017 London attacks]] shows that you are currently engaged in an [[Wikipedia:Edit warring|edit war]]. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the [[Wikipedia:Talk page guidelines|talk page]] to work toward making a version that represents [[Wikipedia:Consensus|consensus]] among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See [[Wikipedia:BOLD, revert, discuss cycle|BRD]] for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant [[Wikipedia:Noticeboards|noticeboard]] or seek [[Wikipedia:Dispute resolution|dispute resolution]]. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary [[Wikipedia:Protection policy|page protection]]. |
|||
'''Being involved in an edit war can result in your being [[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocked from editing]]'''—especially if you violate the [[Wikipedia:Edit warring#The three-revert rule|three-revert rule]], which states that an editor must not perform more than three [[Help:Reverting|reverts]] on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—'''even if you don't violate the three-revert rule'''—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.<!-- Template:uw-3rr -->[[User:Sagecandor|Sagecandor]] ([[User talk:Sagecandor|talk]]) 00:49, 4 June 2017 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 00:53, 4 June 2017
|
Index 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 |
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 5 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 4 sections are present. |
Thursday
11
July
08:03 UTC
Please add comments to the bottom
A page you started (2016 Nice terrorist attack) has been reviewed!
Thanks for creating 2016 Nice terrorist attack, DHeyward!
Wikipedia editor Pianoman320 just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:
Thanks for adding this redirect!
To reply, leave a comment on Pianoman320's talk page.
Learn more about page curation.
COI Notice
While this isn't looking at your editing... looking at one of the parties talk pages seems to indicate you might be interested in this.
ESPN.com reported her cause of death as stated in the article, which you removed. (talk page stalker) CrashUnderride 18:15, 16 April 2017 (UTC)
- Until we have a name, no it's not BLP material. --DHeyward (talk) 01:25, 17 April 2017 (UTC)
- Continued whitewashing/reversion of cited material is vandalism. "Without a name" is a rule you made up. Desist or I'll go to ANI. Abductive (reasoning) 17:51, 19 April 2017 (UTC)
Major donors to presidential campaigns
You said $10 million is the threshhold for a "major donor" on the Russian interference article talk page. I think it is far less. I don't believe there are more than a dozen individuals who donated more than $1 million. I could be wrong, and would be interested to see any data to the contrary. SPECIFICO talk 23:08, 15 May 2017 (UTC)
- https://www.opensecrets.org/overview/topindivs.php The top 100 are all above $2 million. Soros on that list was $20 million at number 12. One of the Koch's was $4 million. The other wasn't listed so there are probably other bundling mechanisms. Devos was in the top 100 at $3.2 million. Prince was not in the top 100. --DHeyward (talk) 00:46, 16 May 2017 (UTC)