Jump to content

User talk:Doc glasgow: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Doc glasgow (talk | contribs)
[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shaun Bussert]]: :?Sorry, not following that. Sounds complicated. I don't close that many AfDs these days. --~~~~
WP:Non-notability
Line 38: Line 38:


:?Sorry, not following that. Sounds complicated. I don't close that many AfDs these days. --[[User talk:Doc glasgow|Doc]] 15:51, 30 September 2006 (UTC)
:?Sorry, not following that. Sounds complicated. I don't close that many AfDs these days. --[[User talk:Doc glasgow|Doc]] 15:51, 30 September 2006 (UTC)

== WP:Non-notability ==

Why are you marking [[WP:NNOT]] as rejected? I realize that theres like .. four people.. that want this page marked as rejected. But please understand that there are more than 4 people that have been working on this proposal, and are *still* working on it. We (and especially you) have not come to a consensus rejecting this proposal - but we should, on the talk page. So please, don't be presumptuous with your edits. Just because you don't like the proposal, doesn't mean you have to change the page to reflect that. [[User:Fresheneesz|Fresheneesz]] 20:30, 30 September 2006 (UTC)

Revision as of 20:30, 30 September 2006

User:Doc glasgow/tidy


User: Uberlol

Hiya Doc. Thank you for helping me out last time with that guy using my name as his wiki ID.

Unfortunately he has migrated the exact same wiki user page to his new user account "Uberlol" - is there anything you can do about it?

Frontline Ministries International

Was there a problem with my sources for this article? FMI's own webpage is easy to find, their literature is a bit harder to find but I've personally read it, the newspaper articles about them are fairly easy to find, and the DVD is a little harder to find but I've personally seen it. Their stated position is that their leadership heals the blind in Africa, etc. so I see no reason this should be left out of the article.

AfD on Manchester councillor

Hi, I've brought up this AfD: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Abid Chohan, which you had previously commented on a batch of Manchester councillors including Mr Chohan. I think he is one of the least notable entries. Perhaps you feel like commenting? JASpencer 14:10, 24 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Not really, sorry. --Doc 00:44, 28 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You deleted {{User Socialist}} in May, without noting that it was transcluded into a lot of users' pages. Why?! — OwenBlacker 13:14, 27 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Did I? I can't recall. --Doc 00:43, 28 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Peter Werbe Article

So apparently, recorded statements straight from the horse's mouth are not acceptable as sources? --John Alder 23:36, 29 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I have noticed when you closed the above AfD, you did not remove the category template, "REMOVE THIS TEMPLATE WHEN CLOSING THIS AfD". By deleting this when closing it pulls the discussion out of the category. I have deleted it from this discussion, but if you could review any other closures you have done recently and remove the tag from them it would be greatly appreicated. This is a fairly recent change. The guideline is at WP:AFDC. I have been going through the listing in each of the categories CAT:AFD and removing the tag from pages that are closed and adding the approriate category code for those in the uncatagorised group. Thanks.--Gay Cdn (talk) (email) (Contr.) 15:00, 30 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

?Sorry, not following that. Sounds complicated. I don't close that many AfDs these days. --Doc 15:51, 30 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

WP:Non-notability

Why are you marking WP:NNOT as rejected? I realize that theres like .. four people.. that want this page marked as rejected. But please understand that there are more than 4 people that have been working on this proposal, and are *still* working on it. We (and especially you) have not come to a consensus rejecting this proposal - but we should, on the talk page. So please, don't be presumptuous with your edits. Just because you don't like the proposal, doesn't mean you have to change the page to reflect that. Fresheneesz 20:30, 30 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]