Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Merlin (software) (2nd nomination): Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
EStam (talk | contribs)
EStam (talk | contribs)
Line 4: Line 4:
:{{la|Merlin (software)}} – (<includeonly>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Merlin (software) (2nd nomination)|View AfD]]</includeonly><noinclude>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2017 July 11#{{anchorencode:Merlin (software)}}|View log]]</noinclude>{{int:dot-separator}} <span class="plainlinks">[https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Merlin_(software)_(2nd_nomination) Stats]</span>)
:{{la|Merlin (software)}} – (<includeonly>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Merlin (software) (2nd nomination)|View AfD]]</includeonly><noinclude>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2017 July 11#{{anchorencode:Merlin (software)}}|View log]]</noinclude>{{int:dot-separator}} <span class="plainlinks">[https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Merlin_(software)_(2nd_nomination) Stats]</span>)
:({{Find sources AFD|Merlin (software)}})
:({{Find sources AFD|Merlin (software)}})
*'''KEEP''': The article isn't depending on any features published in blog. It simply informs about the positioning of the software variants, their initial releases and their main usage. It should be kept because it is a standard application like MS Project, but for the Mac. References to the blog are removed. Thanks. [[User:EStam|EStam]] ([[User talk:EStam|talk]]) 20:51, 11 July 2017 (UTC)
*'''KEEP''': The article isn't depending on any features published in blog. It simply informs about the positioning of the software variants, their initial releases and their main usage. It should be kept because it is a standard application like MS Project, but for the Mac. References to the blog are removed. Thanks. [[User:ViStam|ViStam]] ([[User talk:ViStam|talk]]) 20:51, 11 July 2017 (UTC)


Mere promoting the product for the sake of features published in blog and creating an article on Wikipedia does not stands a chance for encyclopedia material . [[User:Light2021|Light2021]] ([[User talk:Light2021|talk]]) 14:20, 11 July 2017 (UTC)
Mere promoting the product for the sake of features published in blog and creating an article on Wikipedia does not stands a chance for encyclopedia material . [[User:Light2021|Light2021]] ([[User talk:Light2021|talk]]) 14:20, 11 July 2017 (UTC)

Revision as of 18:56, 11 July 2017

Merlin (software) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
  • KEEP: The article isn't depending on any features published in blog. It simply informs about the positioning of the software variants, their initial releases and their main usage. It should be kept because it is a standard application like MS Project, but for the Mac. References to the blog are removed. Thanks. ViStam (talk) 20:51, 11 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Mere promoting the product for the sake of features published in blog and creating an article on Wikipedia does not stands a chance for encyclopedia material . Light2021 (talk) 14:20, 11 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 16:45, 11 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]