Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Quran code (2nd nomination): Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
EddyJawed (talk | contribs)
counter argument
Line 8: Line 8:
:<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This debate has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Islam|list of Islam-related deletion discussions]]. [[User:Deacon Vorbis|Deacon Vorbis]] ([[User talk:Deacon Vorbis|talk]]) 03:31, 14 July 2017 (UTC)</small>
:<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This debate has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Islam|list of Islam-related deletion discussions]]. [[User:Deacon Vorbis|Deacon Vorbis]] ([[User talk:Deacon Vorbis|talk]]) 03:31, 14 July 2017 (UTC)</small>
*'''Merge''' with [[United Submitters International]], it may become notable (aGain) kn the future, but deleting it wouldn't be good either. --[[Special:Contributions/58.187.168.206|58.187.168.206]] ([[User talk:58.187.168.206|talk]]) 07:42, 14 July 2017 (UTC)
*'''Merge''' with [[United Submitters International]], it may become notable (aGain) kn the future, but deleting it wouldn't be good either. --[[Special:Contributions/58.187.168.206|58.187.168.206]] ([[User talk:58.187.168.206|talk]]) 07:42, 14 July 2017 (UTC)

Deleting a topic such as this, which has had a huge impact on the lives of so many Muslims, to the point that many dissented from the traditional mainstream sects and joined Quranist or the Submitter denomination, is grossly unfair. The 19 code is a significant finding, and its topic is so vast with the number of finding linked to this code being discovered all the time. I’d like to question the true motive behind anyone who would wish to delete such a topic altogether. On the contrary I think this article needs to be expanded further so all are aware of the number of coincidences involving this numerical code which hasn’t been researched enough. A set of references to the each finding should be included too.
([[User talk:Eddy Jawed|talk]]) 13:34, 14 July 2017 (GMT)

Revision as of 12:35, 14 July 2017

Quran code

Quran code (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This topic isn't notable enough for its own article; it already has a blurb at United Submitters International, which is plenty. Practically all the sources are from Rashad himself. Of the two or so that aren't, one is just a random webpage critiquing his ideas, and the other is a dead link. Moreover, this is WP:FRINGE numerology, and the article doesn't treat it as such. Deacon Vorbis (talk) 03:27, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Islam-related deletion discussions. Deacon Vorbis (talk) 03:31, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleting a topic such as this, which has had a huge impact on the lives of so many Muslims, to the point that many dissented from the traditional mainstream sects and joined Quranist or the Submitter denomination, is grossly unfair. The 19 code is a significant finding, and its topic is so vast with the number of finding linked to this code being discovered all the time. I’d like to question the true motive behind anyone who would wish to delete such a topic altogether. On the contrary I think this article needs to be expanded further so all are aware of the number of coincidences involving this numerical code which hasn’t been researched enough. A set of references to the each finding should be included too. (talk) 13:34, 14 July 2017 (GMT)