Special operations: Difference between revisions
new article for Linda Robinson - journalist and author was wanted |
|||
Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
===United States=== |
===United States=== |
||
The decade 2003–2012 saw U.S. national security strategy rely on special operations to an unprecedented degree. Identifying, hunting, and killing terrorists became a central task in the [[Global War on Terrorism]] (GWOT). |
The decade 2003–2012 saw U.S. national security strategy rely on special operations to an unprecedented degree. Identifying, hunting, and killing terrorists became a central task in the [[Global War on Terrorism]] (GWOT). Linda Robinson, Adjunct Senior Fellow for U.S. National Security and Foreign Policy at the [[Council on Foreign Relations]], argued that the organizational structure became flatter and cooperation with the intelligence community was stronger, allowing special operations to move at the "speed of war".<ref name="Robinson SPECOPS">{{cite journal|last=Robinson|first=Linda|title=The Future of Special Operations: Beyond Kill and Capture|journal=Foreign Affairs|date=November–December 2012|volume=91|issue=6|pages=110–122|accessdate=5 November 2012}}</ref> Special Operations appropriations are costly: Its budget went from $2.3 billion in 2001 to $10.5 billion in 2012.<ref name="Robinson SPECOPS" /> Some experts argued the investment was worthwhile, pointing to the raid in May 2011 that killed [[Osama bin Laden]] in [[Abbottabad]], Pakistan. Others claimed that the emphasis on Special Operations precipitated a misconception that it was a substitute for prolonged conflict. "Raids and drone strikes are tactics that are rarely decisive and often incur significant political and diplomatic costs for the United States. Although raids and drone strikes are necessary to disrupt dire and imminent threats…special operations leaders readily admit that they should not be the central pillar of U.S. military strategy."<ref name="Robinson SPECOPS" /> Instead, Special Operations commanders stated that grand strategy should include their "indirect approach", which meant working with non-U.S. partners to accomplish security objectives. "Special Operations forces forge relationships that can last for decades with a diverse collection of groups: training, advising, and operation alongside other countries' militaries, police forces, tribes, militias or other information groups."<ref name="Robinson SPECOPS" /> |
||
== Special operations forces == |
== Special operations forces == |
Revision as of 05:19, 18 July 2017
Special operations (S.O.) are military operations that are "special" or unconventional and carried out by dedicated special forces and other special operations forces units using unconventional methods and resources. Special operations may be performed independently of or in conjunction with, conventional military operations. The primary goal is to achieve a political or military objective where a conventional force requirement does not exist or might adversely affect the overall strategic outcome. Special operations are usually conducted in a low-profile manner that aims to achieve the advantages of speed, surprise, and violence of action against an unsuspecting target. Special ops are typically carried out with limited numbers of highly trained personnel that are adaptable, self-reliant and able to operate in all environments, and able to use unconventional combat skills and equipment. Special operations are usually implemented through specific, tailored intelligence.[1]
Use and efficiency
United States
The decade 2003–2012 saw U.S. national security strategy rely on special operations to an unprecedented degree. Identifying, hunting, and killing terrorists became a central task in the Global War on Terrorism (GWOT). Linda Robinson, Adjunct Senior Fellow for U.S. National Security and Foreign Policy at the Council on Foreign Relations, argued that the organizational structure became flatter and cooperation with the intelligence community was stronger, allowing special operations to move at the "speed of war".[2] Special Operations appropriations are costly: Its budget went from $2.3 billion in 2001 to $10.5 billion in 2012.[2] Some experts argued the investment was worthwhile, pointing to the raid in May 2011 that killed Osama bin Laden in Abbottabad, Pakistan. Others claimed that the emphasis on Special Operations precipitated a misconception that it was a substitute for prolonged conflict. "Raids and drone strikes are tactics that are rarely decisive and often incur significant political and diplomatic costs for the United States. Although raids and drone strikes are necessary to disrupt dire and imminent threats…special operations leaders readily admit that they should not be the central pillar of U.S. military strategy."[2] Instead, Special Operations commanders stated that grand strategy should include their "indirect approach", which meant working with non-U.S. partners to accomplish security objectives. "Special Operations forces forge relationships that can last for decades with a diverse collection of groups: training, advising, and operation alongside other countries' militaries, police forces, tribes, militias or other information groups."[2]
Special operations forces
Special operations forces (SOF) is a term primarily used in the West. It is an "all encompassing" term that defines a nation’s specialized units. The term "special forces" is also used by countries around the world to describe their specialized unit(s), however. Examples of special operations include: special reconnaissance/military intelligence, unconventional warfare, psyops and counter-terrorism actions. Special operations are sometimes associated with unconventional warfare, counter-insurgency (operations against insurgents), operations against guerrillas or irregular forces, low-intensity operations, and foreign internal defense. Special operations may be carried out by conventional forces but are often carried out by special operations forces (SOF), which are military units that are specifically trained and use special equipment, weapons, and tactics. They are sometimes referred to as "elite" forces, commandos, and special operators.
In the United States military, SOF includes Army Special Forces ("Green Berets"), Army Rangers, Navy SEALs, Navy SWCC, Air Force Pararescue, Marine Special Operations (MARSOC), select specially trained Military Intelligence/Counterintelligence units, Civil Affairs (active duty), Military Information Support Operations (MISO) (formerly Psychological Operations (PSYOP)) personnel, and Special Operations Aviation units under the umbrella of the United States Army Special Operations Command. While not formally designated as Special Operations Forces, there are several units whose missions and training are identical to SOF but operate in support of conventional combatant commanders, to include: US Army Long Range Reconnaissance Companies/Detachments (LRSC/LRSD), US Army Pathfinder Companies (PFDR), Military Police Special Reaction Teams (equivalent to civilian police SWAT teams), Marine Force Recon, Explosive Ordnance Disposal units (EOD), and various sniper teams.
In the recent conflicts the 101st Airborne Division (Air Assault) has been increasingly involved conducting special operations especially the training and development of other states' military and security forces and counter terrorism operations.[3][4][5][6] This is known in the special operations community as foreign internal defense and counter-terrorism.[5] It was announced 14 January 2016 that 1,800 soldiers from the 101st's Headquarters and its 2nd Brigade Combat Team will deploy soon on regular rotations to Baghdad and Irbil to train and advise Iraqi army and Kurdish Peshmerga forces who are expected in the coming months to move toward Mosul, the Islamic State group's de facto headquarters in Iraq.[7]
Recently the 82nd Airborne Division has also been conducting special operations in Iraq. The 82nd Airborne has been assigned to advise and assist Iraqi Security Forces.[8]
In March 2015, a 173rd Airborne battalion of around 600 American paratroopers headed to Ukraine to train Ukrainian national guard troops. The training took place at the Yavoriv training center near the western Ukrainian city of Lviv. The 173rd Airborne paratroopers trained the Ukrainians on how to better defend themselves against Russian and rebel artillery and rockets. Training also included securing roads, bridges, and other infrastructure and treating and evacuating casualties.[9] This program was known as Fearless Guardian which was congressionally approved under the Global Contingency Security Fund. Under the program, the United States trained three battalions of Ukrainian troops over a six-month period.[10]
Other special operations forces include the British Special Boat Service and Special Air Service, the Japanese Special Forces Group and Special Boarding Unit, the Irish Army Ranger Wing, Polish GROM, the Norwegian Marinejegerkommandoen and FSK; as well as the Indian MARCOS and Para (Special Forces).
See also
- Foreign internal defense
- List of special forces units
- Long Range Reconnaissance Patrol
- Pathfinder (military)
- Special Activities Division
References
- ^ https://web.archive.org/web/20131020230203/http://www.shadowspear.com/special-operations-research.html ShadowSpear: About Special Operations
- ^ a b c d Robinson, Linda (November–December 2012). "The Future of Special Operations: Beyond Kill and Capture". Foreign Affairs. 91 (6): 110–122.
{{cite journal}}
:|access-date=
requires|url=
(help) - ^ Army to Deploy 101st Airborne Soldiers to Oversee Iraqi Army Training | Military.com
- ^ Carter to Army’s 101st: You will prepare Iraqis to retake Mosul - Stripes
- ^ a b U.S. troops preparing Iraqi forces for 'much, much harder' fight in Mosul
- ^ Army to Deploy 101st Airborne Soldiers to Afghanistan | Military.com
- ^ 1,800 soldiers from the 101st's Headquarters and its 2nd Brigade Combat Team will deploy soon on regular rotations to Baghdad and Irbil to train and advise Iraqi army and Kurdish peshmerga forces who are expected in the coming months to move toward Mosul, the Islamic State group's de facto headquarters in Iraq.
- ^ "Army to Deploy 1,700 Paratroopers to Iraq". military.com. 3 November 2016.
- ^ Fox News
- ^ "Fearless Guardian". flickr.com. Retrieved 25 September 2016.
Further reading
- Linda Robinson (2013), One Hundred Victories: Special Ops and the Future of American Warfare, New York: Public Affairs, ISBN 978-1-61039-149-8 .