Jump to content

Talk:Allied technological cooperation during World War II: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Bias: Revert my earlier - already included
Bias: Link
Line 60: Line 60:
:: [[Gun_turret#Aircraft|Power-operated aircraft gun turret]]s
:: [[Gun_turret#Aircraft|Power-operated aircraft gun turret]]s
:: [[Disney bomb]]
:: [[Disney bomb]]
::[[Rolls-Royce Merlin]]
:: [[Rolls-Royce Merlin]]
:: [[Malcolm hood]]


:US ones;
:US ones;

Revision as of 08:26, 27 July 2017

WikiProject iconMilitary history: Technology / British / European / North America / Russian & Soviet / United States / World War II Start‑class
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.
StartThis article has been rated as Start-class on the project's quality scale.
B checklist
Associated task forces:
Taskforce icon
Military science, technology, and theory task force
Taskforce icon
British military history task force
Taskforce icon
European military history task force
Taskforce icon
North American military history task force
Taskforce icon
Russian, Soviet and CIS military history task force
Taskforce icon
United States military history task force
Taskforce icon
World War II task force

Contribution

If you know relavent information please make contributions to this page as I'm sure that there are hundreds of other examples of the articles title than the number i have managed to come up with for the base line article. Siman 17:17, 11 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I was surprised that no mention of the Tizard Mission. --jmb (talk) 10:42, 7 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I've added a bit abut it in the second para. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 213.40.251.192 (talk) 12:49, 30 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Axis article?

Any thoughts on adding an Axis Forces equivalent to this article or, possible, including both in the same? I favor the former, but figured it would be worth discussing.--Surv1v4l1st (Talk|Contribs) 17:15, 15 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Soviet AWD trucks

USSR created 6x6 truck - ZIS-36 - before war, but hadn't enough time to develop it and begin mass production, so Studebaker was indeed first mass 6x6 truck. Also, USSR wanted to produce diesel engine for truck, but had no enough time and decided to build licensied Detroit Diesel 71 series engines, but Winter War led to trade embargo. During WWII USSR imported most technologies of this engines, but Cold War stopped this process and soviet engineers developed this engine for mass production by themselves. GM 4-71 and 6-71 became base for YaAZ-204 and 206 respectively which were produced in 1947-1993 [1]Ходок (talk) 14:06, 9 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Bias

This article, is Anglo-American biased in general, and heavily favors the UK as the benefactor in specific. Undoubtedly, there had to have been more technological cooperation amongst the Allies in general, and in specific there had to be as many examples of American technology being the benefactor of British. Also, the part about British nuclear scientists, seems to omit the fact that when the British scientists first saw the scope and magnitude of the American project, they concluded the British equivalant was markedly behind. In general, this article is insightful and interesting, but it favors the US and UK all-around, and the UK even more so. Jersey John (talk) 08:37, 25 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Well if you'd like to state to what extent the British benefited from US technical innovation then feel free to add it. However, the only US-devised technical innovations that I can think of that the British benefited from were the DUKW and the LVT. All the other significant new stuff came from this side of the pond, or else originated here, such as the proximity fuze. The US's main technical contribution was in the further development and subsequent mass production of the stuff that was thought up in the UK.
As for the other 'Allied' countries, many had little technical base, so their contributions were, by necessity, minor. For the Soviet Union their technical contribution, at least to the Western side of the war, was negligible. Name one WWII Soviet-devised innovation that was later adopted by many other countries. I can't think of one. Here's a list of the British ones:
APDS - anti-tank round
Hobart's Funnies - specialised armoured vehicles
Microwave radar - (i.e., modern) radar
H2S radar - just about every radar system in the world is based on this scanning system
PPI - see above
Whittle jet engine
HEAT - anti-tank round
Liberty ship - based on an original British design and request
LST - as above
Escort carrier
LCT - landing craft
Gyro gunsight - this made shooting down an enemy aircraft simple
ASDIC - now called sonar
Foxer - anti-acoustic torpedo noise-maker
Hedgehog - anti-submarine weapon
Early warning system - see Chain Home
GCI - radar-controlled interception of attacking aircraft by fighters
IFF - for use with above
Enigma - code breaking
Collossus - as above
Bore evacuator - used on tank guns
Thermal sleeve - as above
ECM - also Electronic warfare - see No. 100 Group RAF
Grand Slam bomb
Tallboy bomb
Bouncing bomb
GEE - later developed as LORAN
Oboe
Motor Torpedo Boat
FIDO - fog dispersal for airfields
Huff-Duff - high-frequency direction-finding for hunting U-boats
Bubble canopy
Plastic explosive
Littlejohn adaptor
Squid
Penicillin
Power-operated aircraft gun turrets
Disney bomb
Rolls-Royce Merlin
Malcolm hood
US ones;
Bazooka
LVT
DUKW
Walkie Talkie
Fido - acoustic torpedo
There are probably others but ATM off-hand I can't think of any more. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.4.57.101 (talk) 13:56, 22 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]