Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Scibaby: Difference between revisions
Salvidrim! (talk | contribs) Archiving case to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Scibaby/Archive |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
{{SPIarchive notice|Scibaby}} |
{{SPIarchive notice|Scibaby}} |
||
{{SPIpriorcases}} |
{{SPIpriorcases}} |
||
===27 July 2017=== |
|||
{{SPI case status|CUrequest}} |
|||
====Suspected sockpuppets==== |
|||
* {{checkuser|1=Shareride}} |
|||
* {{checkuser|1=Splendus}} |
|||
<!-- You may duplicate the templates above ({{checkuser}} and {{checkIP}}) to list more accounts--> |
|||
*[http://tools.wmflabs.org/betacommand-dev/cgi-bin/uc?uc=Scibaby User compare report] <small>''Auto-generated every hour.''</small> |
|||
*[http://tools.wmflabs.org/sigma/editorinteract.py Editor interaction utility] |
|||
Hello, to whomever is reading this. Shareride and Splendus are obvious socks of SOMEONE, and the sockmaster is most likely Scibaby. They have similar POVs on Global warming, and their (as well as scibaby's socks, for that matter) edit summaries have the same tone, if you get my drift. Shareride and Splendus have edited the same article, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Laura_Skandera_Trombley , to remove puffery and POV-pushing. While this is a good thing, it is odd how they somehow came to the same article and agreed 100% with each other. One of Scibaby's socks used the exact same word as Shareride did in one of their edit summaries, namely qualitative, which is a rarely used word. I request a CheckUser to confirm if these editors are socks and to flush out any sleepers if they are socks. [[Special:Contributions/92.30.178.11|92.30.178.11]] ([[User talk:92.30.178.11|talk]]) 14:19, 27 July 2017 (UTC) |
|||
====<big>Comments by other users</big>==== |
|||
<small>''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See [[Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/SPI/Guidance#Defending yourself against claims|Defending yourself against claims]].''</small> |
|||
====<big>Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments</big>==== |
|||
----<!--- All comments go ABOVE this line, please. --> |
|||
Revision as of 14:19, 27 July 2017
Scibaby
- Scibaby (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
Older archives were moved to an archive of the archive because of the page size and are listed below:
Prior SSP or RFCU cases may exist for this user:
27 July 2017
– A user has requested CheckUser. An SPI clerk will shortly look at the case and endorse or decline the request.
Suspected sockpuppets
- Shareride (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- Splendus (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
- Editor interaction utility
Hello, to whomever is reading this. Shareride and Splendus are obvious socks of SOMEONE, and the sockmaster is most likely Scibaby. They have similar POVs on Global warming, and their (as well as scibaby's socks, for that matter) edit summaries have the same tone, if you get my drift. Shareride and Splendus have edited the same article, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Laura_Skandera_Trombley , to remove puffery and POV-pushing. While this is a good thing, it is odd how they somehow came to the same article and agreed 100% with each other. One of Scibaby's socks used the exact same word as Shareride did in one of their edit summaries, namely qualitative, which is a rarely used word. I request a CheckUser to confirm if these editors are socks and to flush out any sleepers if they are socks. 92.30.178.11 (talk) 14:19, 27 July 2017 (UTC)
Comments by other users
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.