User talk:Bluetongue: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 09:37, 6 October 2006

Welcome!

Hello, Bluetongue, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! -- Longhair\^talk 07:34, 6 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Schapelle Corby

Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia. Wikipedia is not a mere directory of links nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include (but are not limited to) links to personal web sites, links to web sites that you are affiliated with, and links that exist to attract visitors to a web site or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam policies for further explanations of links that are considered appropriate. If you feel the link should be added to the article, then please discuss it on the article's talk page rather than re-adding it. See the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you. -- Longhair\^talk 07:35, 6 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Schapelle Site

Bluetongue, Longhair With regards to the Schapelle page, - are you both aware of the 3-revert rule?? [1]. I suggest care be taken. --Merbabu 09:17, 6 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This seems like some petty game to me. The guys/girls that run that site do so to help Schapelle Corby - nothing more and nothing less. I am interested in Schapelles situation and considered the link a worthwhile and postive addition. They even linked back to wikipedia!! To suggest that a link to a supporters forum for schapelle corby on a wiki for her is spam is completely outrageous and your decision to repeatedly remove it is indeed 100% malicious. The site is non profit so I do not for life of me what you think they have to gain for doing so. Why that link in particular would be removed whilst 'dead' links where left indicates the purility of all this. Furthermore, the removal of ALL relevant links from the Schapelle Corby wiki serves absolutely no purpose at all. Bluetongue 09:37, 6 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 16: / Line 16: @@
 Bluetongue, Longhair
 With regards to the Schapelle page, - are you both aware of the 3-revert rule?? [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Three_revert_rule]. I suggest care be taken. --[[User:Merbabu|Merbabu]] 09:17, 6 October 2006 (UTC)
+This seems like some petty game to me. The guys/girls that run that site do so to help Schapelle Corby - nothing more and nothing less.  I am interested in Schapelles situation and considered the link a worthwhile and postive addition. They even linked back to wikipedia!!  To suggest that a link to a supporters forum for schapelle corby on a wiki for her is spam is completely outrageous and your decision to repeatedly remove it is indeed 100% malicious. The site is non profit so I do not for life of me what you think they have to gain for doing so. Why that link in particular would be removed whilst 'dead' links where left indicates the purility of all this. Furthermore, the removal of ALL relevant links from the Schapelle Corby wiki serves absolutely no purpose at all.  [[User:Bluetongue|Bluetongue]] 09:37, 6 October 2006 (UTC)