Talk:Roller Life: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 02:35, 14 September 2017

Contested deletion

This page should not be speedy deleted as an unambiguous copyright infringement, because... (your reason here) --Adjinwis (talk) 22:56, 13 September 2017 (UTC) As you can see .. the links connected this article, this was a simple mistake. There is no copyright infringement. We accidentally hit enter before it was ready to go while we were coding this article. If you look it over now, you'll see that everything should check out. There was no intentional copyright infringement, it was simply an accident. If this article does not meet your guidelines, please let me know what I need to do to meet them. Thank you. --Adjinwis (talk) 22:56, 13 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Contested deletion

This page should not be speedy deleted as an unambiguous copyright infringement, because... (Also, should I just change the way the film is described? Is that the issue? I am really confused why this is flagged. Please advise. ) --Adjinwis (talk) 23:04, 13 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, it's largely copied from the sources cited. If it weren't largely copied from other sources, then there wouldn't be a concern over copyright infringement. And even with permission (see WP:Donating copyrighted material), Wikipedia is for neutrally written, disinterested reference articles, not copies of public relations content. Largoplazo (talk) 01:09, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I'm trying to see whether the film would meet Wikipedia's notability guidelines, particularly the general ones and the ones pertaining to films. I'm not really seeing substantial coverage in appreciable amounts in independent reliable sources. Most of the sources you supplied are brief mentions or simple listings associated with local film festivals. I'm not finding too much beyond those through Google. Largoplazo (talk) 01:26, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The copy is updated. There are some minor sources I agree but the Milwaukee_Journal_Sentinel, Isthmus_(newspaper), Wisconsin Gazette all have done full stories on the documentary. What are reliable sources if those are not? (Adjinwis (talk) 02:35, 14 September 2017 (UTC))[reply]

@@ Line 9: / Line 9: @@
 :Yes, it's largely copied from the sources cited. If it weren't largely copied from other sources, then there wouldn't be a concern over copyright infringement. And even with permission (see [[WP:Donating copyrighted material]]), Wikipedia is for neutrally written, disinterested reference articles, not copies of public relations content. [[User:Largoplazo|Largoplazo]] ([[User talk:Largoplazo|talk]]) 01:09, 14 September 2017 (UTC)
 :I'm trying to see whether the film would meet Wikipedia's [[WP:N|notability guidelines]], particularly the [[WP:GNG|general ones]] and [[WP:NFILM|the ones pertaining to films]]. I'm not really seeing substantial coverage in appreciable amounts in independent reliable sources. Most of the sources you supplied are brief mentions or simple listings associated with local film festivals. I'm not finding too much beyond those through Google. [[User:Largoplazo|Largoplazo]] ([[User talk:Largoplazo|talk]]) 01:26, 14 September 2017 (UTC)
+The copy is updated. There are some minor sources I agree but the Milwaukee_Journal_Sentinel, Isthmus_(newspaper), Wisconsin Gazette all have done full stories on the documentary. What are reliable sources if those are not? ([[User:Adjinwis|Adjinwis]] ([[User talk:Adjinwis|talk]]) 02:35, 14 September 2017 (UTC))