Talk:Rigour: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 00:55, 1 December 2004

I see the final para has been made a separate duplicate page at mathematical rigour. I don't see this as an improvement, and suggest it be redirected again.

Charles Matthews 13:52, 15 Nov 2004 (UTC)

This article is biased in favor of rigor. It assumes that rigor is good as opposed to an often unnecessary straightjacket and associates it with concepts like intellectual honesty. This article is prejudiced against "nonrigorous" forms of thinking. Critical

Revision as of 13:52, 15 November 2004 edit Charles Matthews (talk \| contribs) Autopatrolled, Administrators 358,629 edits copy-and-paste page		Revision as of 00:55, 1 December 2004 edit undo Critical (talk \| contribs) 16 edits explanation on POV Next edit →
Line 2:		Line 2:

	[[User:Charles Matthews\|Charles Matthews]] 13:52, 15 Nov 2004 (UTC)		[[User:Charles Matthews\|Charles Matthews]] 13:52, 15 Nov 2004 (UTC)

			This article is biased in favor of rigor. It assumes that rigor is good as opposed to an often unnecessary straightjacket and associates it with concepts like intellectual honesty. This article is prejudiced against "nonrigorous" forms of thinking. [[User:Critical\|Critical]]