User:Netscott: Difference between revisions
rvv |
rv- no explanation given by Chacor. These awards have been rescinded. |
||
Line 34: | Line 34: | ||
<!--leave comments above this line --> |
<!--leave comments above this line --> |
||
</td></tr></table> |
</td></tr></table> |
||
[[Image:Barnstar.png|frame|Barnstar awarded to '''Netscott''' by [[User:Karl Meier|Karl Meier]] for his many great contributions, and for always being fair and reasonable in discussions regarding controversial topics. Awarded: 21:10, 11 July 2006]] |
|||
{{award2|image=IslamicBarnstar.png|size=100px|topic=The Islamic Barnstar Award|text= ''Awarded by [[User:Timothy Usher|Timothy Usher]] on [[June 1]], [[2006]]'' for your relentless defense of reason on [[Jyllands-Posten Muhammad cartoons controversy]] }} |
|||
{{Award2|image=Barnstar.png|120px|A Barnstar awarded by [[User:Striver]] to Netscott for him assisting me through the undeletion proces of [[Barra binte Samawal]]. The article was speedy deleted, and Netscott helped me to get it survive an afd. Thus, a relatively obscure but notable part of Islamic and Jewish history is preserved on Wikipedia!}} |
{{Award2|image=Barnstar.png|120px|A Barnstar awarded by [[User:Striver]] to Netscott for him assisting me through the undeletion proces of [[Barra binte Samawal]]. The article was speedy deleted, and Netscott helped me to get it survive an afd. Thus, a relatively obscure but notable part of Islamic and Jewish history is preserved on Wikipedia!}} |
||
[[ar:مستخدم:Netscott]] |
[[ar:مستخدم:Netscott]] |
Revision as of 06:09, 8 October 2006
Wikipedia:Babel | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Search user languages |
May the spirit of convivencia [1] return to the world and spread (and include all ethnicities and beliefs).
Netscott 16:24, 3 April 2006 (UTC)
Netscott is the user name for Scott Stevenson.
Something that needs to be stopped on Wikipedia!
The utilization of Wikipedia as a tool to spread propaganda. As an editor with some standing here I have seen other editors do their best to edit articles to further their ends (ie: their POVs). There probably should be a Wikipedia project called Wikipedia:Countering propaganda to combat this problem.
Contentious editing
Do you believe you have a valid point of contention about my edits and would like the whole world to know it the moment they come to my user page?
Here's your chance!
If you can competently argue for why any of my edits are less than valid and you feel
a need to vent, please first post something bordering on insult about my edit
(certainly not about me, remember WP:NPA) and then present your argument(s) (or use my talk page if you're hesitant to edit my user page) for why they are not valid. When insulting my edit(s)/argument(s)/view(s) use words like
asinine, inane or the old standby ridiculous.
Know that the more ostentatious and sesquipedalian the words are that you use to insult my edits,
the more I'll be liable to "take notice" and give proper attention to your entire argument. Also, the more likely they'll remain for awhile on my User page.
There's only one simple rule... make your comments only in the box provided below
and try to have fun!
On second thought, if you simply want to insult my edit(s)/argument(s)/view(s) then by all means, do so here but do your best to remain civil.
Netscott 17:17, 23 March 2006 (UTC)
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/7/7e/Charles.Blondin.jpg)
Comments:
|
![]() |
A Barnstar awarded by User:Striver to Netscott for him assisting me through the undeletion proces of Barra binte Samawal. The article was speedy deleted, and Netscott helped me to get it survive an afd. Thus, a relatively obscure but notable part of Islamic and Jewish history is preserved on Wikipedia! |