Wikipedia talk:Deceased Wikipedians: Difference between revisions
m Archiving 2 discussion(s) to Wikipedia talk:Deceased Wikipedians/Archive 2) (bot |
|||
| Line 28: | Line 28: | ||
What's with the "to good to be true" comment in the footnote? [[User:Chuck Entz|Chuck Entz]] ([[User talk:Chuck Entz|talk]]) 01:25, 21 October 2017 (UTC) |
What's with the "to good to be true" comment in the footnote? [[User:Chuck Entz|Chuck Entz]] ([[User talk:Chuck Entz|talk]]) 01:25, 21 October 2017 (UTC) |
||
:{{ping|Angelo6397}} {{diff|Wikipedia:Deceased_Wikipedians/2011|654366543|651486503|This is your edit}}. Care to explain? <span class="nowrap" style="font-family:copperplate gothic light;">[[User:Chris troutman|<span style="color:#345">Chris Troutman</span>]] ([[User talk:Chris troutman|<span style="color:#345">talk</span>]])</span> 01:31, 21 October 2017 (UTC) |
:{{ping|Angelo6397}} {{diff|Wikipedia:Deceased_Wikipedians/2011|654366543|651486503|This is your edit}}. Care to explain? <span class="nowrap" style="font-family:copperplate gothic light;">[[User:Chris troutman|<span style="color:#345">Chris Troutman</span>]] ([[User talk:Chris troutman|<span style="color:#345">talk</span>]])</span> 01:31, 21 October 2017 (UTC) |
||
== Full cascading page protection only to deceased wikipedian admins or so? == |
|||
I know that please give certain deceased wikipedian staff/admin/bureaucrat a full cascaded protection that admins can only edit. Registered users attempting to vandalize the deceased wikipedian staff/admin/bureaucrat would be blocked indefinitely and have the page of deceased wikipedian staff/admin/bureaucrat fully protected by admin to avoid further abuse and vandalism. [[Special:Contributions/124.106.137.103|124.106.137.103]] ([[User talk:124.106.137.103|talk]]) |
|||
Revision as of 00:46, 14 November 2017
| Main page | Guidelines | Discussion | Project Members |
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Deceased Wikipedians page. |
|
Archives: 1, 2, 3Auto-archiving period: 30 days  |
 | This page was nominated for deletion on 27 October 2007. The result of the discussion was Nomination withdrawn. |
| This page was nominated for deletion on 2 February 2009. The result of the discussion was Keep. |
Note this page was also once erroneously nominated at AFD and speedily kept on procedural grounds.
|
|||
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 30 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 3 sections are present. |
User:Allen3
This is sad: User:Allen3—William Allen Peckham—died on December 30, 2016; William Allen Peckham-Thank you-RFD (talk) 20:30, 5 October 2017 (UTC)
- Thanks for letting us know, RFD. BlueMoonset (talk) 21:41, 5 October 2017 (UTC)
(JohnCD)
As far as I can tell, (JohnCD) passed away in 2017, not 2016. Shouldn't his entry/page be moved to the appropriate year? — Preceding unsigned comment added by FROZYO! (talk • contribs)
- Where are you getting that from? He died on 30 December 2016. ‑ Iridescent 19:45, 13 October 2017 (UTC)
Frank "Onno" Braun (Frankonno)
What's with the "to good to be true" comment in the footnote? Chuck Entz (talk) 01:25, 21 October 2017 (UTC)
- @Angelo6397: This is your edit. Care to explain? Chris Troutman (talk) 01:31, 21 October 2017 (UTC)
Full cascading page protection only to deceased wikipedian admins or so?
I know that please give certain deceased wikipedian staff/admin/bureaucrat a full cascaded protection that admins can only edit. Registered users attempting to vandalize the deceased wikipedian staff/admin/bureaucrat would be blocked indefinitely and have the page of deceased wikipedian staff/admin/bureaucrat fully protected by admin to avoid further abuse and vandalism. 124.106.137.103 (talk)