User talk:129.6.39.91: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 20:27, 15 November 2017

Welcome!

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia!

Someone using this IP address, 129.6.39.91, has made edits to National Institute of Standards and Technology which do not conform to our policies and therefore have been reverted. For more information on this, see Wikipedia's policies on vandalism and limits on acceptable additions. If you'd like to experiment with the syntax, please do so in the sandbox rather than in articles. If you did not do this, you may wish to consider getting a username to avoid confusion with other editors.

You don't have to log in to read or edit pages on Wikipedia, but creating an account is quick, free, requires no personal information, and has many benefits. Without a username, your IP address is used to identify you.

Some good links for newcomers are:

Help contents – the main help page.
Quick guide – a "cheatsheet" listing the main editing commands.
The five pillars of Wikipedia
Contributing to Wikipedia
Tutorial

Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and a timestamp. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions.

Again, welcome! JesseRafe (talk) 15:46, 14 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Dude - whoever you are on the NIST campus, knock it off. You have no idea what you are talking about - NIST DOES NOT SET STANDARDS!!129.6.190.21 (talk) 20:27, 15 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

November 2017

Your recent editing history at National Institute of Standards and Technology shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
Only warning JesseRafe (talk) 15:56, 14 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 22: / Line 22: @@
 Again, welcome!<!-- Template:Welcome-anon-unconstructive --> <!-- Template:uw-cluebotwarning1 --> [[User:JesseRafe|JesseRafe]] ([[User talk:JesseRafe|talk]]) 15:46, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
 |}
+Dude - whoever you are on the NIST campus, knock it off.  You have no idea what you are talking about - NIST DOES NOT SET STANDARDS!![[Special:Contributions/129.6.190.21|129.6.190.21]] ([[User talk:129.6.190.21|talk]]) 20:27, 15 November 2017 (UTC)
 == November 2017 ==