Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Very Bad Wizards: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary
mNo edit summary
Line 5: Line 5:
:({{Find sources AFD|Very Bad Wizards}})
:({{Find sources AFD|Very Bad Wizards}})
Doesn't seem to have any independent coverage, thus making it fail our [[WP:GNG|general notability guidelines]]. [[User:RileyBugz|<span style="color:#2D3D67">RileyBugz</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:RileyBugz|<span style="color:#D7000B">会話</span>]]</sup><sub>[[Special:Contributions/RileyBugz|<span style="color:#D7000B">投稿記録</span>]]</sub> 19:25, 27 November 2017 (UTC)
Doesn't seem to have any independent coverage, thus making it fail our [[WP:GNG|general notability guidelines]]. [[User:RileyBugz|<span style="color:#2D3D67">RileyBugz</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:RileyBugz|<span style="color:#D7000B">会話</span>]]</sup><sub>[[Special:Contributions/RileyBugz|<span style="color:#D7000B">投稿記録</span>]]</sub> 19:25, 27 November 2017 (UTC)
::This is a work in progress, but I've added some independent sources discussing the podcast (or rather discussing the discussions on the podcast). This podcast is also ranked 2nd in the iTunes category 'philosophy', although I haven't found a way to link to this statistic which is found withing iTunes.[[User:Oysteinp|O. Prytz]] ([[User talk:Oysteinp|talk]]) 19:51, 27 November 2017 (UTC)
::This is a work in progress, but I've added some independent sources discussing the podcast (or rather discussing the discussions on the podcast). This podcast is also ranked 2nd in the iTunes category 'philosophy', although I haven't found a way to link to this statistic which is found within iTunes.[[User:Oysteinp|O. Prytz]] ([[User talk:Oysteinp|talk]]) 19:51, 27 November 2017 (UTC)

Revision as of 19:55, 27 November 2017

Very Bad Wizards (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Doesn't seem to have any independent coverage, thus making it fail our general notability guidelines. RileyBugz会話投稿記録 19:25, 27 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This is a work in progress, but I've added some independent sources discussing the podcast (or rather discussing the discussions on the podcast). This podcast is also ranked 2nd in the iTunes category 'philosophy', although I haven't found a way to link to this statistic which is found within iTunes.O. Prytz (talk) 19:51, 27 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]