Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Andy Stephenson: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary |
Haruka3 2000 (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
He is a non-notable journalist. No evidence of any substantial publications. Internet allegations and rumors of both fraud and foul-play are used to smear his reputation and memory. One of the reasons that notability requirements are in place is to give privacy to friends and family of the deceased. |
He is a non-notable journalist. No evidence of any substantial publications. Internet allegations and rumors of both fraud and foul-play are used to smear his reputation and memory. One of the reasons that notability requirements are in place is to give privacy to friends and family of the deceased. |
||
*'''STRONG KEEP''' Andy's work should be respected. This page is an honor to him. --[[User:Haruka3_2000|Haruka3_2000]] |
|||
*'''STRONG KEEP'' - I don't understand why it needs to be deleted. It should remain up in honor and respect for his hard work. It's also a memorial. |
*'''STRONG KEEP'' - I don't understand why it needs to be deleted. It should remain up in honor and respect for his hard work. It's also a memorial. |
||
*'''Delete''' as nominator. --[[User:Tbeatty|Tbeatty]] 04:44, 16 October 2006 (UTC) |
*'''Delete''' as nominator. --[[User:Tbeatty|Tbeatty]] 04:44, 16 October 2006 (UTC) |
||
Revision as of 08:08, 16 October 2006
He is a non-notable journalist. No evidence of any substantial publications. Internet allegations and rumors of both fraud and foul-play are used to smear his reputation and memory. One of the reasons that notability requirements are in place is to give privacy to friends and family of the deceased.
- STRONG KEEP Andy's work should be respected. This page is an honor to him. --Haruka3_2000
- 'STRONG KEEP - I don't understand why it needs to be deleted. It should remain up in honor and respect for his hard work. It's also a memorial.
- Delete as nominator. --Tbeatty 04:44, 16 October 2006 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. The only refs on that page that meet WP:RS are the two obituary links. --Aaron 04:47, 16 October 2006 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Morton devonshire 04:53, 16 October 2006 (UTC)
- Delete - Notability is debatable, but the article is used by the deceased's friends to push political POV, and spread a concocted fantasy of the circumstances of the man's death which blames "conservatives". I attempted to correct the factual inaccuracies some time back, and was never quite successful against anonymous reverters. See this diff of something I removed last night. This is an example of the mindset of the people who are exploiting this man's death. - Crockspot 04:55, 16 October 2006 (UTC)
- Delete fails WP:BIO.--MONGO 05:01, 16 October 2006 (UTC)
- Delete. Wow, a non-notable subject that suffers from factual issues. Em-jay-es 05:12, 16 October 2006 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Brimba 05:12, 16 October 2006 (UTC)
- Keep a google search turns up some nationally notable sources: several Seattle Weekly articles, as well as the subject of an HBO documentary . He's notable. However, someone needs to block the article from anon edits and remove all NPOV problems. It would appear that he is a controverial subject, but that is no reason for deletion. He has been noted in several national sources, and so is notable and verifiable. The article just needs a MAJOR clean-up and protection. --Jayron32 05:48, 16 October 2006 (UTC)
- STRONG Keep - His life, career and death are all notable. NBGPWS 07:23, 16 October 2006 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Karag 07:38, 16 October 2006 (UTC)
- STRONG Keep - This article needs a rewrite, not a deletion. His candidacy for Sec. of State in Washington and the fact that national news media reported on him is reason enough to keep the page, regardless of what you may think of him. ChildOfTheMoon83 07:41, 16 October 2006 (UTC)