User talk:Stripedtiger: Difference between revisions
Stripedtiger (talk | contribs) |
Stripedtiger (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
All of this information can be daunting, but if you have a question and can't find the answer, you can always ask [[User:Last_Malthusian|me]] on [[User_talk:Last_Malthusian|my talk page]] or go to [[Wikipedia:Where to ask a question]]. One last thing: '''please [[Wikipedia:Sign your posts on talk pages|sign your name]]''' when leaving messages for others on article and user talk pages using (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. I hope you enjoy editing! --[[User:Last_Malthusian|Malthusian]] <small>[[User_talk:Last_Malthusian|(talk)]]</small> 23:09, 20 February 2006 (UTC) |
All of this information can be daunting, but if you have a question and can't find the answer, you can always ask [[User:Last_Malthusian|me]] on [[User_talk:Last_Malthusian|my talk page]] or go to [[Wikipedia:Where to ask a question]]. One last thing: '''please [[Wikipedia:Sign your posts on talk pages|sign your name]]''' when leaving messages for others on article and user talk pages using (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. I hope you enjoy editing! --[[User:Last_Malthusian|Malthusian]] <small>[[User_talk:Last_Malthusian|(talk)]]</small> 23:09, 20 February 2006 (UTC) |
||
== [[Suzetta Miñet]] == |
|||
{{{icon|[[Image:Nuvola apps important.svg|30px|]] }}}You currently appear to be engaged in an [[Wikipedia:Edit war|edit war]]{{{{{subst|}}}#if:Suzetta Miñet|  according to the reverts you have made on [[:Suzetta Miñet]]}}. Note that the [[Wikipedia:Three-revert rule|three-revert rule]] prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the [[Wikipedia:Three-revert rule|three-revert rule]]. If you continue, you may be [[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocked]] from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a [[Wikipedia:Consensus|consensus]] among editors. {{{{{subst|}}}#if:{{{2|}}}|{{{2}}}|}}<!-- Template:uw-3rr --> — [[User:HelloAnnyong|'''<span style="color: #aaa">Hello</span><span style="color: #666">Annyong</span>''']] <span style="font-size: .7em;">[ [[User_talk:HelloAnnyong|t]] · [[Special:Contributions/HelloAnnyong|c]] ]</span> 21:40, 21 December 2007 (UTC) |
|||
==Speedy deletion of [[:The Last Days of FOXHOUND]]== |
==Speedy deletion of [[:The Last Days of FOXHOUND]]== |
||
[[Image:Ambox warning_pn.svg|48px|left]] A tag has been placed on [[:The Last Days of FOXHOUND]] requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under [[WP:CSD#A7|section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion]], because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the [[WP:CSD#Articles|criteria for speedy deletion]], articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please [[Wikipedia:Notability|see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable]], as well as our subject-specific [[Wikipedia:Notability (people)|notability guideline for biographies]]. |
[[Image:Ambox warning_pn.svg|48px|left]] A tag has been placed on [[:The Last Days of FOXHOUND]] requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under [[WP:CSD#A7|section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion]], because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the [[WP:CSD#Articles|criteria for speedy deletion]], articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please [[Wikipedia:Notability|see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable]], as well as our subject-specific [[Wikipedia:Notability (people)|notability guideline for biographies]]. |
Revision as of 08:44, 22 January 2018
Welcome!
Hello, Stripedtiger, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some links that can help you get started editing:
And for more detailed information:
- Help pages - the instruction manual, contains everything you could possibly want to know
- The five pillars of Wikipedia - our principles, or how to get on with other editors
- Manual of Style - how to format articles, where to place pictures, and other stylistic matters.
All of this information can be daunting, but if you have a question and can't find the answer, you can always ask me on my talk page or go to Wikipedia:Where to ask a question. One last thing: please sign your name when leaving messages for others on article and user talk pages using (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. I hope you enjoy editing! --Malthusian (talk) 23:09, 20 February 2006 (UTC)
Speedy deletion of The Last Days of FOXHOUND
A tag has been placed on The Last Days of FOXHOUND requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}}
to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. 9Nak (talk) 09:54, 30 May 2008 (UTC)
Speedy deletion of "JEUXVIDEO"
A page you created, JEUXVIDEO, has been tagged for deletion, as it meets one or more of the criteria for speedy deletion; specifically, it has no content, other than external links, categories, "see also" sections, rephrasing of the title, and/or chat-like comments.
You are welcome to contribute content which complies with our content policies and any applicable inclusion guidelines. However, please do not simply re-create the page with the same content. You may also wish to read our introduction to editing and guide to writing your first article.
Thanks. Boccobrock•T 23:46, 30 May 2008 (UTC)
Speedy deletion of Meristation
Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and the page that you created has been or soon will be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}}
to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Triwbe (talk) 23:50, 30 May 2008 (UTC)
MGS4 Reviews
Hello there. It's general convention not to include non-en reviews in the Reception section of video games. If this were not the case, the sections would expand to huge lengths. Generally, non-en links and sources are not used on the en wiki, they're kept to their respective wikis. The fact that Meristation article has been deleted (above) does not lend well to your assertion of notability (notability and credibility are two very different things). I'm Irish, for example, but it is unlikely an Irish newspaper review of MGS4 would be added to the article, simply as it's not notable. I'm aware of Jeux Video, but I still think the review shouldn't be included on the en wiki. Hope you understand. Thanks! Fin©™ 10:27, 31 May 2008 (UTC)