Jump to content

Talk:Waking up early: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Notification of altered sources needing review #IABot
Line 33: Line 33:


Cheers.—[[User:Cyberbot II|<sup style="color:green;font-family:Courier">cyberbot II</sup>]]<small><sub style="margin-left:-14.9ex;color:green;font-family:Comic Sans MS">[[User talk:Cyberbot II|<span style="color:green">Talk to my owner</span>]]:Online</sub></small> 07:22, 31 March 2016 (UTC)
Cheers.—[[User:Cyberbot II|<sup style="color:green;font-family:Courier">cyberbot II</sup>]]<small><sub style="margin-left:-14.9ex;color:green;font-family:Comic Sans MS">[[User talk:Cyberbot II|<span style="color:green">Talk to my owner</span>]]:Online</sub></small> 07:22, 31 March 2016 (UTC)

== Seems there is a "wrong" Benjamin Franklin ==

"Benjamin Franklin wrote a book called Early Rising: A Natural, Social, and Religious Duty" is accompanied by a portrait of the world-famous Benjamin Franklin. However it seems that the author of the book in question was another Benjamin Franklin.
The book is published on Google Books: https://books.google.ru/books?id=oLkOAAAAIAAJ
In the preface, dated July 23, 1855, the author is writing about himself. So it can't have been Benjamin Franklin of the $100 fame, who lived 1706–1790.
There is rather a long list of Benjamin Franklin's namesakes on https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Benjamin_Franklin_(disambiguation). Judging by the pronounced religious emphasis of the book in question and the dates of life, it may be https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Benjamin_Franklin_(clergyman) who authored the book; however it is still a guess for which I couldn't find a decisive proof.

Revision as of 08:36, 24 January 2018

This page is heavily associated with a person that seems to be promoted to be as capable as Benjamin Franklin. Perhaps some trimmings are needed here. Ancos (talk) 06:02, 5 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

NPOV? This page seems rather one-sided. It appears to implicitly accept the notion that waking up early allows a person to accomplish more. It seems to me that this is neither obvious, nor universally accepted. TomH (talk) 02:09, 10 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thurber quote probably wrong

I'm reluctant to change the Thurber quote myself since I am not willing to track down the cited source, but Google provides the full text of a book title and chapter title that are almost identical. The error seems to have been introduced over three years ago and never edited: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Waking_up_early&diff=287170778&oldid=249524043

The book should be "Fables for Our Times and Famous Poems Illustrated," (Library of Congress shows this title as early as 1940, and does not show the shorter version shown in the article: http://catalog.loc.gov/vwebv/search?searchArg=Thurber+%22Fables+for+our+Time%22&searchCode=GKEY%5E*&searchType=0&recCount=100&sk=en_US)

The fable is called "The Shrike and the Chipmunks." The quote is "Early to rise and early to bed makes a male healthy and wealthy and dead."

The quote can be found on page 19 here.http://www.amazon.com/Fables-Time-Famous-Poems-Illustrated/dp/0060909994/ref=sr_1_12?s=books&ie=UTF8&qid=1346706099&sr=1-12

I corroborated the quote I found in the Feb 18, 1939 issue of The New Yorker (p. 19).

(Google finds the quote with "shrike" only for pages copying the Wikipedia article verbatim.) Danchall (talk) 21:41, 3 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

update: I checked the ISBN provided, and the full title is the same. I strongly doubt that the title of the chapter or the text of the quote has changed from the various sources I found. Danchall (talk) 11:52, 5 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Waking up early. Please take a moment to review my edit. You may add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it, if I keep adding bad data, but formatting bugs should be reported instead. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether, but should be used as a last resort. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 07:22, 31 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Seems there is a "wrong" Benjamin Franklin

"Benjamin Franklin wrote a book called Early Rising: A Natural, Social, and Religious Duty" is accompanied by a portrait of the world-famous Benjamin Franklin. However it seems that the author of the book in question was another Benjamin Franklin. The book is published on Google Books: https://books.google.ru/books?id=oLkOAAAAIAAJ In the preface, dated July 23, 1855, the author is writing about himself. So it can't have been Benjamin Franklin of the $100 fame, who lived 1706–1790. There is rather a long list of Benjamin Franklin's namesakes on https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Benjamin_Franklin_(disambiguation). Judging by the pronounced religious emphasis of the book in question and the dates of life, it may be https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Benjamin_Franklin_(clergyman) who authored the book; however it is still a guess for which I couldn't find a decisive proof.