Wikipedia:Administrator intervention against vandalism: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Luna Santin (talk | contribs)
Ryulong (talk | contribs)
m Reporting Awsomepossum using ARV 2.1.
Line 39: Line 39:
*{{vandal|65.95.151.70}} Keeps editing [[User:Longbranch]], no obvious reason to believe IP is Longbranch. [[User:Dave|Dave]] 21:45, 20 October 2006 (UTC)
*{{vandal|65.95.151.70}} Keeps editing [[User:Longbranch]], no obvious reason to believe IP is Longbranch. [[User:Dave|Dave]] 21:45, 20 October 2006 (UTC)
:Looks like you just warned with bv -- I'll block if they keep it up any longer. [[User:Luna Santin|Luna Santin]] 21:50, 20 October 2006 (UTC)
:Looks like you just warned with bv -- I'll block if they keep it up any longer. [[User:Luna Santin|Luna Santin]] 21:50, 20 October 2006 (UTC)
*{{vandal|Awsomepossum}} - Vandalism only account --—[[User:Ryulong|Ryūlóng]] ([[User talk:Ryulong|竜龍]]) 21:53, 20 October 2006 (UTC)

Revision as of 21:53, 20 October 2006

Wikipedia:Administrator intervention against vandalism/header

If this page displays out of date information even after you've refreshed your browser, please Purge the server's cache. To view the list of recent blocks by Admins, see: Special:Log/block.

Alerts

Bot-reported

User reported

  • I saw maybe three pages and deleted I think one? Doesn't seem quite ready for a block, since they've apparently stopped; will leave on list. Luna Santin 21:31, 20 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
User wants warnings removed on the grounds that "These warnings, bans and blocks are sort of like criminal records, so the general public shouldn't have access to those." User refuses to stop. - ¡Kribbeh!Speak!\Contribs 21:26, 20 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Ehh, if they want to reform and contribute helpfully, we may as well just let them. Let's wait and see what they do next? Luna Santin 21:30, 20 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah, he's not helping, just reverting and leaving a message about how it's some sort of "criminal record". Shadow1 (talk) 21:46, 20 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
He wouldn't have to keep reverting if we, I dunno, left him alone for thirty seconds? ;) Luna Santin 21:47, 20 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Looks like you just warned with bv -- I'll block if they keep it up any longer. Luna Santin 21:50, 20 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]