Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/EBitcoin: Difference between revisions
Appearance
Content deleted Content added
m reply |
No edit summary |
||
Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
::Oh, it's legitimately a cryptocurrency. It exists, it has a customer base. But, it is not notable. <sub style="border:2.5px solid #16872C;padding:1.3px;">[[User:Vermont|<span style="color:#000000;background:#ffffff;">Vermont</span>]] |[[User talk:Vermont|<span style="color:#000000;background:#ffffff;"> reply here</span>]]</sub> 22:10, 26 February 2018 (UTC) |
::Oh, it's legitimately a cryptocurrency. It exists, it has a customer base. But, it is not notable. <sub style="border:2.5px solid #16872C;padding:1.3px;">[[User:Vermont|<span style="color:#000000;background:#ffffff;">Vermont</span>]] |[[User talk:Vermont|<span style="color:#000000;background:#ffffff;"> reply here</span>]]</sub> 22:10, 26 February 2018 (UTC) |
||
:'''Delete and salt''', per nom and Hrodvarsson. We should be careful not to legitimise malicious cryptocurrencies - we do not want to become an instrument in someone else's scam. -- Thanks, [[User:Alfie|Alfie]]. <sup><span class="smallcaps" style="font-variant:small-caps;">[[User talk:Alfie|talk to me]] | [[Special:Contributions/Alfie|contribs]]</span></sup> 21:59, 26 February 2018 (UTC) |
:'''Delete and salt''', per nom and Hrodvarsson. We should be careful not to legitimise malicious cryptocurrencies - we do not want to become an instrument in someone else's scam. -- Thanks, [[User:Alfie|Alfie]]. <sup><span class="smallcaps" style="font-variant:small-caps;">[[User talk:Alfie|talk to me]] | [[Special:Contributions/Alfie|contribs]]</span></sup> 21:59, 26 February 2018 (UTC) |
||
*'''Keep''' Not agreed, it's clearly not malicious, this cryptocurrency exists and works since september 2017. You should read references, this currency is legit and this page has to exist. I donated a lot of money to Wikipedia and I feel a bit shocked of that I read here. Please read the references and check the market exchanges to observe that it's not malicious. Thank you very much. |
Revision as of 22:11, 26 February 2018
- EBitcoin (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Not notable. Promotional wording. Few secondary, reliable sources. Most results for it on google are sites like Coinmarketcap, that just show it's current value. Vermont | reply here 23:43, 22 February 2018 (UTC)
Comment: About 2 minutes after I nom'd this, I checked it for a copyvio. Evidently, most of it was copied from this. Vermont | reply here 23:49, 22 February 2018 (UTC)
- Delete - yet another promotional Bitcoin article. No evidence of any notability but plenty of evidence of promotional editing. Despite all the refs, fails WP:GNG. Velella Velella Talk 00:19, 23 February 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Finance-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 00:19, 23 February 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Economics-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 00:19, 23 February 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 00:19, 23 February 2018 (UTC)
- Delete Fails WP:GNG and is a violation of WP:PROMO. (In all likelihood it is another scamcoin co-opting the BTC name.) Hrodvarsson (talk) 00:47, 23 February 2018 (UTC)
- Delete We are not Bitcoinpedia L3X1 ◊distænt write◊ 02:40, 23 February 2018 (UTC)
- Legit This article is legit. I am a user of this currency and this cryptocurrency exists and is used by thousands people. All the references exists and this is not a promotion, no commercial product is to sell. At the beginning, all the token have been given to the community, for free (airdrop). This is now a foundation driven by a community. This community won many votes listing (example : https://www.reddit.com/r/eBTC/comments/7s78j7/ebitcoin_made_the_1st_place_on_kucoins_community/). Capitalisation is more than 10 millions dollars and daily exchanges are important : https://coinmarketcap.com/currencies/ebtcnew/#markets . This article has to be kept. Thank you very much and enjoy your day.
- Oh, it's legitimately a cryptocurrency. It exists, it has a customer base. But, it is not notable. Vermont | reply here 22:10, 26 February 2018 (UTC)
- Delete and salt, per nom and Hrodvarsson. We should be careful not to legitimise malicious cryptocurrencies - we do not want to become an instrument in someone else's scam. -- Thanks, Alfie. talk to me | contribs 21:59, 26 February 2018 (UTC)
- Keep Not agreed, it's clearly not malicious, this cryptocurrency exists and works since september 2017. You should read references, this currency is legit and this page has to exist. I donated a lot of money to Wikipedia and I feel a bit shocked of that I read here. Please read the references and check the market exchanges to observe that it's not malicious. Thank you very much.