Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/EBitcoin

EBitcoin

EBitcoin (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not notable. Promotional wording. Few secondary, reliable sources. Most results for it on google are sites like Coinmarketcap, that just show it's current value. _{Vermont | reply here} 23:43, 22 February 2018 (UTC)

 Comment: About 2 minutes after I nom'd this, I checked it for a copyvio. Evidently, most of it was copied from this. _{Vermont | reply here} 23:49, 22 February 2018 (UTC)

• Delete - yet another promotional Bitcoin article. No evidence of any notability but plenty of evidence of promotional editing. Despite all the refs, fails WP:GNG.  Velella  ^{Velella Talk}   00:19, 23 February 2018 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Finance-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 00:19, 23 February 2018 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Economics-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 00:19, 23 February 2018 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 00:19, 23 February 2018 (UTC)

• Delete Fails WP:GNG and is a violation of WP:PROMO. (In all likelihood it is another scamcoin co-opting the BTC name.) Hrodvarsson (talk) 00:47, 23 February 2018 (UTC)
• Delete We are not Bitcoinpedia L3X1 ◊distænt write◊ 02:40, 23 February 2018 (UTC)
• Legit This article is legit. I am a user of this currency and this cryptocurrency exists and is used by thousands people. All the references exists and this is not a promotion, no commercial product is to sell. At the beginning, all the token have been given to the community, for free (airdrop). This is now a foundation driven by a community. This community won many votes listing (example : https://www.reddit.com/r/eBTC/comments/7s78j7/ebitcoin_made_the_1st_place_on_kucoins_community/). Capitalisation is more than 10 millions dollars and daily exchanges are important : https://coinmarketcap.com/currencies/ebtcnew/#markets . This article has to be kept. Thank you very much and enjoy your day.

Oh, it's legitimately a cryptocurrency. It exists, it has a customer base. But, it is not notable. _{Vermont | reply here} 22:10, 26 February 2018 (UTC)

Delete and salt, per nom and Hrodvarsson. We should be careful not to legitimise malicious cryptocurrencies - we do not want to become an instrument in someone else's scam. -- Thanks, Alfie. ^{talk to me | contribs} 21:59, 26 February 2018 (UTC)

• Keep Not agreed, it's clearly not malicious, this cryptocurrency exists and works since september 2017. You should read references, this currency is legit and this page has to exist. I donated a lot of money to Wikipedia and I feel a bit shocked of that I read here. Please read the references and check the market exchanges to observe that it's not malicious. Thank you very much.