Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/John Layke: Difference between revisions
Appearance
Content deleted Content added
m Substing templates: {{Spa}}. See User:AnomieBOT/docs/TemplateSubster for info. |
Defterlamb63 (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
*'''Delete''' promotional article for someone in an overly promotional field.[[User:Johnpacklambert|John Pack Lambert]] ([[User talk:Johnpacklambert|talk]]) 01:42, 21 March 2018 (UTC) |
*'''Delete''' promotional article for someone in an overly promotional field.[[User:Johnpacklambert|John Pack Lambert]] ([[User talk:Johnpacklambert|talk]]) 01:42, 21 March 2018 (UTC) |
||
*'''Keep''' Dr. John Layke deserves credit for his many achievements. I was trying to add more references on him and I got accused by JBH of getting paid to do so. Maybe if you let us add relevant information about Dr. Layke and stop deleting it, it would not be considered weak at all. Thank you for listening --[[User:Glowhomeschool|Glowhomeschool]] ([[User talk:Glowhomeschool|talk]]) 15:16, 22 March 2018 (UTC) <small>— [[User:Glowhomeschool|Glowhomeschool]] ([[User talk:Glowhomeschool|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Glowhomeschool|contribs]]) has made [[Wikipedia:Single-purpose account|few or no other edits]] outside this topic. </small> |
*'''Keep''' Dr. John Layke deserves credit for his many achievements. I was trying to add more references on him and I got accused by JBH of getting paid to do so. Maybe if you let us add relevant information about Dr. Layke and stop deleting it, it would not be considered weak at all. Thank you for listening --[[User:Glowhomeschool|Glowhomeschool]] ([[User talk:Glowhomeschool|talk]]) 15:16, 22 March 2018 (UTC) <small>— [[User:Glowhomeschool|Glowhomeschool]] ([[User talk:Glowhomeschool|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Glowhomeschool|contribs]]) has made [[Wikipedia:Single-purpose account|few or no other edits]] outside this topic. </small> |
||
*'''Keep''' This makes me really mad. I was trying to write an essay for my class. But when i came back to get more information it had all been deleted. thanks a lot your doing a great job.--[[User:Defterlamb63|Defterlamb63]] ([[User talk:Defterlamb63|talk]]) 21:58, 22 March 2018 (UTC)--[[User:Defterlamb63|Defterlamb63]] ([[User talk:Defterlamb63|talk]]) 21:58, 22 March 2018 (UTC) |
Revision as of 21:58, 22 March 2018
- John Layke (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
I did my best to clean the article up but once I removed the celebrity gossip cited to the Daily Mail, the award mill and an LA Times paid post I found all that remained was PR interview stuff. He obviously markets himself well and provides many interviews but there is nothing written about him. There was a claim in the original article that he is Fellow of the American College of Surgeons but it was not supported by the source. Based on that he does not meet General Notability Guidelines or WP:ANYBIO. Jbh Talk 22:01, 16 March 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Jbh Talk 22:04, 16 March 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Health and fitness-related deletion discussions. Jbh Talk 22:04, 16 March 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. Jbh Talk 22:04, 16 March 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. Jbh Talk 22:04, 16 March 2018 (UTC)
- Weak delete - he is the subject of a few articles... really needs more RS to establish wp:not. Deathlibrarian (talk) 01:58, 20 March 2018 (UTC)
- Keep Thank you JBH for doing a great job in editing the article. Since you removed well sourced links I myself think that the notability was weekend. I added references from Daily Mail and magazines and tried my best to keep it neutral as suggested by you. I think after reading WP:GNG that he meets this criteria. Thanks Mia Watson (talk) 07:10, 20 March 2018 (UTC) — Mia Watson (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
- As I mentioned when I initially removed them, the Daily Mail is not an acceptable source for statements about living people. I have removed those sources both for that reason and because the articles are discussing the medical treatment of names third parties. Please read WP:BLP and WP:DAILYMAIL. Thank you. Jbh Talk 11:40, 20 March 2018 (UTC)
- Delete promotional article for someone in an overly promotional field.John Pack Lambert (talk) 01:42, 21 March 2018 (UTC)
- Keep Dr. John Layke deserves credit for his many achievements. I was trying to add more references on him and I got accused by JBH of getting paid to do so. Maybe if you let us add relevant information about Dr. Layke and stop deleting it, it would not be considered weak at all. Thank you for listening --Glowhomeschool (talk) 15:16, 22 March 2018 (UTC) — Glowhomeschool (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
- Keep This makes me really mad. I was trying to write an essay for my class. But when i came back to get more information it had all been deleted. thanks a lot your doing a great job.--Defterlamb63 (talk) 21:58, 22 March 2018 (UTC)--Defterlamb63 (talk) 21:58, 22 March 2018 (UTC)