Talk:Engineering change order: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 21:09, 27 March 2018

Electronics C‑class Mid‑importance

	Electronics portal This article is part of WikiProject Electronics, an attempt to provide a standard approach to writing articles about electronics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. Leave messages at the project talk pageElectronicsWikipedia:WikiProject ElectronicsTemplate:WikiProject Electronicselectronic articles
C	This article has been rated as C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

There is nothing special about the chip industry in the way that a change is tracked. The information about the chip industry should move to a topic about the chip industry. More information about document control would be helpful since ECO are relevant to all manufacturing and relevant to all document control.

Should Engineering Change Order and Engineering Change Notice be merged?

It could use a section on Field Change Orders (FCOs) - an update made by field service personnel to systems already shipped from manufacturing. And a couple of redirects for the terms. AHMartin (talk) 21:19, 11 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed merge with Engineering change notice

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.

The result of this discussion was to merge ECN into ECO Grj23 (talk) 21:09, 27 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Different names for same topic Rathfelder (talk) 22:27, 24 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Go for it.--Wtshymanski (talk) 00:57, 25 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I included the information from ECN into ECO. I think we could now redirect ECN to ECO and be done with the merge. Grj23 (talk) 21:01, 27 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

@@ Line 12: / Line 12: @@
 == Proposed merge with [[Engineering change notice]] ==
-different names for same topic [[User:Rathfelder|Rathfelder]] ([[User talk:Rathfelder|talk]]) 22:27, 24 February 2018 (UTC)
+{{Discussion top|result=The result of this discussion was to merge ECN into ECO [[User:Grj23|Grj23]] ([[User talk:Grj23|talk]]) 21:09, 27 March 2018 (UTC)}}
+Different names for same topic [[User:Rathfelder|Rathfelder]] ([[User talk:Rathfelder|talk]]) 22:27, 24 February 2018 (UTC)
 :[[WP:BOLD|Go for it.]]--[[User:Wtshymanski|Wtshymanski]] ([[User talk:Wtshymanski|talk]]) 00:57, 25 February 2018 (UTC)
 :I included the information from ECN into ECO. I think we could now redirect ECN to ECO and be done with the merge. [[User:Grj23|Grj23]] ([[User talk:Grj23|talk]]) 21:01, 27 March 2018 (UTC)
+{{Discussion bottom}}