Wikipedia:WikiProject Electronics/Assessment

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Welcome to the assessment department of the Electronics WikiProject! This department focuses on assessing the quality of Wikipedia's electronic related articles. While much of the work is done in conjunction with the WP:1.0 program, the article ratings are also used within the project itself to aid in recognizing excellent contributions and identifying topics in need of further work.

The ratings are done in a distributed fashion through parameters in the {{Electron}} project banner; this causes the articles to be placed in the appropriate sub-categories of Category:Electronic articles by quality and Category:Electronic articles by importance, which serve as the foundation for an automatically generated worklist.

Contents

FAQ[edit]

1. How do I add an article to the WikiProject? 
Just add {{Electron}} to the talk page; there's no need to do anything else.
2. Someone put a {{Electron}} template on an article, but it's not a Electronic related topic. What should I do? 
Because of the large number of articles we deal with, we occasionally make mistakes and add tags to articles that shouldn't have them. If you notice one, feel free to remove the tag, and optionally leave a note on the talk page of this department (or directly with the person who tagged the article).
3. What is the purpose of the article ratings? 
The objective of the rating system is twofold. First, it allows the project to monitor the quality of articles in our subject areas, and to prioritize work on these articles. Second, the ratings will be used by the Wikipedia 1.0 project to compile a "released version" of Wikipedia that can be distributed to readers. Please note, however, that these ratings are meant for the internal use of the project, and do not imply any official standing within Wikipedia as a whole.
4. How can I get an article rated? 
Please list it in the section for assessment requests below.
5. Who can assess articles? 
Any member of the Electronics WikiProject is free to add—or change—the rating of an article.
6. Why didn't the reviewer leave any comments? 
Unfortunately, due to the volume of articles that need to be assessed, we are unable to leave detailed comments in most cases. If you have particular questions, you might ask the person who assessed the article; they will usually be happy to provide you with their reasoning.
8. What if I don't agree with a rating? 
You can list it in the section for assessment requests below, and someone will take a look at it. Alternately, you can ask any member of the project to rate the article again.
9. Aren't the ratings subjective? 
Yes, they are (see, in particular, the disclaimers on the importance scale), but it's the best system we've been able to devise; if you have a better idea, please don't hesitate to let us know!
10. How can I keep track of changes in article ratings? 
A full log of changes over the past thirty days is available here. If you are just looking for an overview, however, the monthly statistics may be more accessible.
11. What if I have a question not listed here? 
If your question concerns the article assessment process specifically, please refer to the discussion page; for any other issues, you can go to the main project discussion page.

Instructions[edit]

An article's quality assessment is generated from the class parameter in the {{Electron}} project banner on its talk page:

{{Electron|class=???}}

The following values may be used for the class parameter to describe the quality of the article (see Wikipedia:Quality scale for assessment criteria):

FA (for featured articles only; adds articles to Category:FA-Class electronic articles) Featured article FA 
A (adds articles to Category:A-Class electronic articles) A-Class article A 
GA (for good articles only; adds articles to Category:GA-Class electronic articles)  GA 
B (adds articles to Category:B-Class electronic articles) B-Class article B 
C (adds articles to Category:C-Class electronic articles) C-Class article C 
Start (adds articles to Category:Start-Class electronic articles) Start-Class article Start 
Stub (adds articles to Category:Stub-Class electronic articles) Stub-Class article Stub 
FL (for featured lists only; adds articles to Category:FL-Class electronic articles) Featured list FL 
List (adds articles to Category:List-Class electronic articles)  List 

For pages that are not articles, the following values can also be used for the class parameter:

Book (for Wikipedia books; adds pages to Category:Book-Class electronic articles) Wikipedia Book Book 
Category (for categories; adds pages to Category:Category-Class electronic articles) Category page Category 
Disambig (for disambiguation pages; adds pages to Category:Disambig-Class electronic articles) Disambiguation page Disambig 
Draft (for drafts; adds pages to Category:Draft-Class electronic articles)  Draft 
File (for files and timed text; adds pages to Category:File-Class electronic articles)  File 
Portal (for portal pages; adds pages to Category:Portal-Class electronic articles)  Portal 
Project (for project pages; adds pages to Category:Project-Class electronic articles)  Project 
Template (for templates and modules; adds pages to Category:Template-Class electronic articles)  Template 
NA (for any other pages where assessment is unnecessary; adds pages to Category:NA-Class electronic articles)  NA 
??? (articles for which a valid class has not yet been provided are listed in Category:Unassessed electronic articles)  ??? 

The following values may be used for the importance parameter:

The parameter is not used if an article's class is set to NA, and may be omitted in those cases. The importance should be assigned according to the importance scale below.

Articles for which a valid importance is not provided are listed in Category:Unknown-importance electronic articles. The importance should be assigned according to the importance scale below.

Quality scale[edit]

WikiProject article quality grading scheme

Importance scale[edit]

The criteria used for rating article importance are not meant to be an absolute or canonical view of how significant the topic is. Rather, they attempt to gauge the probability of the average reader of Wikipedia needing to look up the topic (and thus the immediate need to have a suitably well-written article on it). Thus, subjects with greater popular notability may be rated higher than topics which are arguably more "important" but which are of interest primarily to collectors.

Note that the rating need not be from the perspective of editor demographics; equally well-known topics should be rated similarly regardless of the country or region in which this is the case. Thus, the rating given to topics which may seem obscure to an editor from one country—but which are well-known in another—should correspond to the higher level of notability in the second country.

Article importance grading scheme
Label Criteria Examples
Top Well-known to the general reader
The subject is well-known to people who are not familiar with electronics. Daily use items and products.
Switch
Computer
High Well-known to a reader with casual electronic knowledge
The subject is known to a significant number of casual electronic savvy people. Other products and well known components.
PCB
Mid Known or of interest to a reader with an interest in electronics
The subject is not well-known, but also not obscure to a reader with an interest in electronics. The subject is unlikely to be interesting to a non-specialist. Less known/historical component level.
Op amp
Low Everything else
The subject is not well-known or particularly significant even to someone with a good knowledge of electronics. Laws and theories.

Statistics[edit]

Current status[edit]


Log[edit]

October 8, 2018[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

Assessed[edit]

October 7, 2018[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

  • Asetek (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Start-Class to C-Class (rev · t).

Assessed[edit]

October 6, 2018[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

Assessed[edit]

Removed[edit]

October 4, 2018[edit]

Assessed[edit]

October 2, 2018[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

September 29, 2018[edit]

Removed[edit]

September 28, 2018[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

Assessed[edit]

September 27, 2018[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

September 26, 2018[edit]

Assessed[edit]

September 25, 2018[edit]

Assessed[edit]

Removed[edit]

September 23, 2018[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

Assessed[edit]

Removed[edit]

September 21, 2018[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

Removed[edit]

September 20, 2018[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

September 18, 2018[edit]

Assessed[edit]

Removed[edit]

September 16, 2018[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

September 13, 2018[edit]

Assessed[edit]

September 9, 2018[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

Assessed[edit]

September 6, 2018[edit]

Removed[edit]

September 5, 2018[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

Assessed[edit]

September 1, 2018[edit]

Assessed[edit]

Removed[edit]

August 28, 2018[edit]

Assessed[edit]

August 27, 2018[edit]

Assessed[edit]

  • 2N696 (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class (rev · t). Importance assessed as Low-Class (rev · t).
  • Asus Zenfone 5Z (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Unassessed-Class (rev · t). Importance assessed as Unknown-Class (rev · t).

August 26, 2018[edit]

Assessed[edit]

August 24, 2018[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

Assessed[edit]

August 22, 2018[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

  • Conformal coating (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Start-Class to C-Class (rev · t). Importance rating changed from Unknown-Class to Mid-Class (rev · t).

Assessed[edit]

August 20, 2018[edit]

Assessed[edit]

Removed[edit]

August 19, 2018[edit]

Assessed[edit]

August 18, 2018[edit]

Assessed[edit]

Removed[edit]

August 16, 2018[edit]

Assessed[edit]

August 14, 2018[edit]

Assessed[edit]

August 12, 2018[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

August 10, 2018[edit]

Assessed[edit]

August 8, 2018[edit]

Assessed[edit]

August 7, 2018[edit]

Assessed[edit]

Removed[edit]

August 5, 2018[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

August 4, 2018[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

  • Breadboard (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from C-Class to Start-Class (rev · t).
  • Perfboard (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Stub-Class to Start-Class (rev · t).

Assessed[edit]

Removed[edit]

August 3, 2018[edit]

Renamed[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

  • Nokia 3310 (talk) reassessed. Importance rating changed from Mid-Class to High-Class (rev · t).

Assessed[edit]

August 2, 2018[edit]

Assessed[edit]

Removed[edit]

August 1, 2018[edit]

Assessed[edit]

  • RKM code (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class (rev · t). Importance assessed as Low-Class (rev · t).

Removed[edit]

July 31, 2018[edit]

Assessed[edit]

July 29, 2018[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

  • Jamboard (talk) reassessed. Importance rating changed from Unknown-Class to Low-Class (rev · t).

Removed[edit]

July 28, 2018[edit]

Assessed[edit]

July 27, 2018[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

Assessed[edit]

Removed[edit]

July 25, 2018[edit]

Assessed[edit]

Removed[edit]

July 24, 2018[edit]

Assessed[edit]

Removed[edit]

July 23, 2018[edit]

Assessed[edit]

July 22, 2018[edit]

Assessed[edit]

Removed[edit]

July 21, 2018[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

Removed[edit]

July 18, 2018[edit]

Assessed[edit]

Removed[edit]

July 17, 2018[edit]

Assessed[edit]

July 15, 2018[edit]

Assessed[edit]

Removed[edit]

July 14, 2018[edit]

Assessed[edit]

Removed[edit]

July 13, 2018[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

July 12, 2018[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

July 11, 2018[edit]

Assessed[edit]

July 10, 2018[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

July 7, 2018[edit]

Assessed[edit]

Requests for assessment[edit]

If you have made significant changes to an article and would like an outside opinion on a new rating for it, please feel free to list it below.

  • Please assess distributed element circuit. It would be helpful, if anyone has the time to do it, to give more detailed comments/review as I am going to put this one through the GA and FA processes. SpinningSpark 16:25, 15 May 2018 (UTC)
OBE. Congratulations! Now a Good article. ~Kvng (talk) 15:12, 10 October 2018 (UTC)
Remains C class. Articles with tags cannot be B class. ~Kvng (talk) 15:12, 10 October 2018 (UTC)
Could you please clarify what you mean by tags? I'm not sure I understand. Thank you. --Daviddwd (talk) 05:46, 11 October 2018 (UTC)
He means maintenance templates and this article has some quite serious ones (verifiability). SpinningSpark 13:51, 11 October 2018 (UTC)
Thank you! --Daviddwd (talk) 14:21, 11 October 2018 (UTC)