Jump to content

Talk:Bailey Quarters: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Kumioko (talk | contribs)
Assess for WPUS and cleanup using AWB (8062)
Questioning the order of events as presented
Line 16: Line 16:


There is no basis whatsoever for the re-merger of this article, once again without any proposal nor discussion. I have reverted this merger. [[User:Fladrif|Fladrif]] ([[User talk:Fladrif|talk]]) 18:53, 26 January 2010 (UTC)
There is no basis whatsoever for the re-merger of this article, once again without any proposal nor discussion. I have reverted this merger. [[User:Fladrif|Fladrif]] ([[User talk:Fladrif|talk]]) 18:53, 26 January 2010 (UTC)

== Personal Life section ==

"By the fourth season, their relationship develops into what Smithers characterized as "more adult", giving both characters another dimension to develop,[5] which leads Bailey to ask him out on a date in the second-season opener"
Something that doesn't develop until the fourth season can't lead to something that happens in the second season. I'd fix this if I knew what was intended... actually, I can guess... [[Special:Contributions/198.202.137.38|198.202.137.38]] ([[User talk:198.202.137.38|talk]]) 21:32, 3 May 2018 (UTC)

Revision as of 21:32, 3 May 2018

WikiProject iconUnited States: Ohio Start‑class Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
StartThis article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by WikiProject Ohio (assessed as Low-importance).


WikiProject iconFictional characters Start‑class
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Fictional characters, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of fictional characters on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
StartThis article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

Object to Merger

I object to the merger of this article. Although it certainly could be improved, it is a notable subject matter and reasonably well-sourced. There was absolutely no proposal or discussion of the merger. Fladrif (talk) 21:13, 25 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

WP:Weight provides no support for this deletion whatsoever. It is irrelevant to the question of this redirect. WP:FICT#Articles_that_don't_meet_the_inclusion_criteria would indicate that the deletion and redirection of this article is entirely improper.Fladrif (talk) 23:27, 28 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Articles need more than two sentences of real world information in order to actually be considered notable. See Homer Simpson, Michael Tritter, Clark Kent (Smallville), and Adrian Monk for examples. Unless you believe that you can improve it to the point where it can match at least the two GAs, this doesn't need to be separated from the main article. TTN (talk) 23:41, 28 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Can do. Actually, I think there are at least two sentences of "real world" coverage already. But, adding more is no problem. But not right this minute. Give me a week, and then let's discuss further.Fladrif (talk) 13:34, 29 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Seem to me that this article meets all the hoops you want it to jump through now. Significant "real world" information. Meets the criteria for "good article". Do you disagree? If so, on what basis, and let's see how to address it.Fladrif (talk) 19:33, 4 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

There is no basis whatsoever for the re-merger of this article, once again without any proposal nor discussion. I have reverted this merger. Fladrif (talk) 18:53, 26 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Personal Life section

"By the fourth season, their relationship develops into what Smithers characterized as "more adult", giving both characters another dimension to develop,[5] which leads Bailey to ask him out on a date in the second-season opener" Something that doesn't develop until the fourth season can't lead to something that happens in the second season. I'd fix this if I knew what was intended... actually, I can guess... 198.202.137.38 (talk) 21:32, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]