User talk:Wolf Cola

May 2018

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for edit warring, as you did at Mohammed Rafi. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 19:25, 5 May 2018 (UTC)

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

Wolf Cola (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I have been on Wikipedia for a over a year now and abide by all rules. I have never been in a situation like this because currently I was actually standing up to the vandalism on multiple pages by a single disruptive editor, so I believe it is unfair that I have received a ban for it. I believe it is actually User:Kishfan using multiple accounts to vandalise various pages. I believe I have been tricked and manipulated by this user as he has misused multiple aliases to turn the table against me, while I was pursuing a vandalism case against him. I request you to look further into this matter of sock-puppetry against Kishfan, that would be a great action if this disruptive editor can be banned to further prevent any more damage on Wikipedia. At the end of the day, I just want what is best for Wikipedia and I am here to make tireless constructive contributions in that regard. Wolf Cola (talk) 19:32, 5 May 2018 (UTC) Wolf Cola (talk) 19:43, 5 May 2018 (UTC)

Notes:

• In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
• Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.

Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=I have been on Wikipedia for a over a year now and abide by all rules. I have never been in a situation like this because currently I was actually standing up to the vandalism on multiple pages by a single disruptive editor, so I believe it is unfair that I have received a ban for it. I believe it is actually [[User:Kishfan]] using multiple accounts to vandalise various pages. I believe I have been tricked and manipulated by this user as he has misused multiple aliases to turn the table against me, while I was pursuing a vandalism case against him. I request you to look further into this matter of sock-puppetry against Kishfan, that would be a great action if this disruptive editor can be banned to further prevent any more damage on Wikipedia. At the end of the day, I just want what is best for Wikipedia and I am here to make tireless constructive contributions in that regard. [[User:Wolf Cola|Wolf Cola]] ([[User talk:Wolf Cola#top|talk]]) 19:32, 5 May 2018 (UTC) [[User:Wolf Cola|Wolf Cola]] ([[User talk:Wolf Cola#top|talk]]) 19:43, 5 May 2018 (UTC) |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=I have been on Wikipedia for a over a year now and abide by all rules. I have never been in a situation like this because currently I was actually standing up to the vandalism on multiple pages by a single disruptive editor, so I believe it is unfair that I have received a ban for it. I believe it is actually [[User:Kishfan]] using multiple accounts to vandalise various pages. I believe I have been tricked and manipulated by this user as he has misused multiple aliases to turn the table against me, while I was pursuing a vandalism case against him. I request you to look further into this matter of sock-puppetry against Kishfan, that would be a great action if this disruptive editor can be banned to further prevent any more damage on Wikipedia. At the end of the day, I just want what is best for Wikipedia and I am here to make tireless constructive contributions in that regard. [[User:Wolf Cola|Wolf Cola]] ([[User talk:Wolf Cola#top|talk]]) 19:32, 5 May 2018 (UTC) [[User:Wolf Cola|Wolf Cola]] ([[User talk:Wolf Cola#top|talk]]) 19:43, 5 May 2018 (UTC) |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=I have been on Wikipedia for a over a year now and abide by all rules. I have never been in a situation like this because currently I was actually standing up to the vandalism on multiple pages by a single disruptive editor, so I believe it is unfair that I have received a ban for it. I believe it is actually [[User:Kishfan]] using multiple accounts to vandalise various pages. I believe I have been tricked and manipulated by this user as he has misused multiple aliases to turn the table against me, while I was pursuing a vandalism case against him. I request you to look further into this matter of sock-puppetry against Kishfan, that would be a great action if this disruptive editor can be banned to further prevent any more damage on Wikipedia. At the end of the day, I just want what is best for Wikipedia and I am here to make tireless constructive contributions in that regard. [[User:Wolf Cola|Wolf Cola]] ([[User talk:Wolf Cola#top|talk]]) 19:32, 5 May 2018 (UTC) [[User:Wolf Cola|Wolf Cola]] ([[User talk:Wolf Cola#top|talk]]) 19:43, 5 May 2018 (UTC) |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}

Wolf Cola - Just promise me that you won't continue edit warring on that Mohammed Rafi article and I'll unblock you. That's all that I was trying to stop... and if you agree that you won't, then I'll consider this a resolved matter as far as it goes and the block will no longer be necessary. I'll await your response here. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 19:45, 5 May 2018 (UTC)

Hi Oshwah, yes I have always promised to stand up against vandals destroying Wikipedia no matter what and that is why I dont engage in such edit wars unless the reputation of an article is heavily at risk. But what action is being taken against those users that continually vandalise articles and I am talking about the potential sock-puppeteer User:Kishfan who has been creating disruptions for the past hour, I have already reported him through Twinkle and requested for his case to be investigated. His name itself is inappropriate and suggests that his account has been created for the purpose of fandom, isn't that an indication in itself that his contributions could be biased in the first place? I would kindly like some advice from you on how to deal with similar cases in the future and how I can avoid getting banned for standing up to vandalism to the best of my ability. Should I not tirelessly revert vandalism by disruptive editors in the future? How should I tackle this issue where a single user is using multiple aliases to provoke edit wars? Kindly give me some advice on this issue. Thanks. Wolf Cola (talk) 20:12, 5 May 2018 (UTC)