Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/JRP Collection Paris: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively

← Previous edit Next edit →

Content deleted Content added

VisualWikitext

Inline

Revision as of 13:01, 31 May 2018

JRP Collection Paris

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Promotion of a company. Paid Users SaiLeeKom (talk) 08:49, 31 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Talk 08:58, 31 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Nevada-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Talk 08:58, 31 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This article should not be deleted. The argument is that I have been paid to make this article in which there is no proof revolving around these accusations whatsoever. — Preceding unsigned comment added by RevengeOfTheRobots (talk • contribs) 09:02, 31 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This article also qualifies to be a stub article. I read through every provision that explains what a stub article is and this was created specifically following those guidelines. — Preceding unsigned comment added by RevengeOfTheRobots (talk • contribs) 09:08, 31 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Promoting a company using the name of the great Michael Jackson and his family Jackson family.SaiLeeKom (talk) 09:18, 31 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Keep.Actually, this company was started by Michael and the Jackson family. Get your facts straight. Both are his colognes he created but he passed away before the launch. The Jackson family still put them out because fans like myself demanded for it.— Preceding unsigned comment added by RevengeOfTheRobots (talk • contribs)

Keep Not sure I'm seeing this as a paid article. The sources show notability, So this seems like an easy keep to me. If the submitter is concerned about tone, they are welcome to change it, but that's not a reason for deletion.Egaoblai (talk) 10:40, 31 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you.. please close this discussion and leave my article alone. I've already noticed several other pages that have no references that are up and running well.

Revision as of 10:47, 31 May 2018 edit The Mighty Glen (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers 21,562 edits unsigned ← Previous edit		Revision as of 13:01, 31 May 2018 edit undo RevengeOfTheRobots (talk \| contribs) 299 edits No edit summary Next edit →
Line 17:		Line 17:

	*'''Keep''' Not sure I'm seeing this as a paid article. The sources show notability, So this seems like an easy keep to me. If the submitter is concerned about tone, they are welcome to change it, but that's not a reason for deletion.[[User:Egaoblai\|Egaoblai]] ([[User talk:Egaoblai\|talk]]) 10:40, 31 May 2018 (UTC)		*'''Keep''' Not sure I'm seeing this as a paid article. The sources show notability, So this seems like an easy keep to me. If the submitter is concerned about tone, they are welcome to change it, but that's not a reason for deletion.[[User:Egaoblai\|Egaoblai]] ([[User talk:Egaoblai\|talk]]) 10:40, 31 May 2018 (UTC)

			Thank you.. please close this discussion and leave my article alone. I've already noticed several other pages that have no references that are up and running well.