Talk:Internet Society: Difference between revisions
→training and IPv6 .. only issues?: new section |
m →training and IPv6 .. only issues?: adding signature |
||
Line 55: | Line 55: | ||
Here's a few more issues [https://www.google.co.nz/search?q=issues+site%3Ainternetsociety.org&oq=issues+site%3Ainternetsociety.org&aqs=chrome..69i57.6404j0j4&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8 here]. |
Here's a few more issues [https://www.google.co.nz/search?q=issues+site%3Ainternetsociety.org&oq=issues+site%3Ainternetsociety.org&aqs=chrome..69i57.6404j0j4&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8 here]. |
||
[[User:Avaiki|Avaiki]] ([[User talk:Avaiki|talk]]) 16:12, 31 May 2018 (UTC) |
Revision as of 16:12, 31 May 2018
{{WikiProject banner shell}}
to this page and add the quality rating to that template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.![]() | Computing Start‑class High‑importance | |||||||||
|
{{WikiProject banner shell}}
to this page and add the quality rating to that template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.![]() | Internet Start‑class Top‑importance | |||||||||
|
![]() | This article is written in American English, which has its own spelling conventions (color, defense, traveled) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
New Internet Society Logo
In 2016 the Internet Society launched a nelfgdgfdw logo, which is visible at the top of https://www.internetsociety.org/ The logo now on this Wikipedia page is no longer accurate. I can provide a new logo as I work for the Internet Society Communications team. However because of that affiliation I am hesitant to update the page directly. Does anyone object if I make that change? Dyork (talk) 15:12, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
The Internet Society and ISOC
I have never seen the Internet Society referred to as "the ISOC". ISOC is, I think, "not quite an acronym". --Alvestrand (talk) 06:17, 11 December 2007 (UTC)
- Quite right. I guess it's the official abbreviation. Wwwhatsup (talk) 07:12, 11 December 2007 (UTC)
Anonymity
I'm just curious about the Internet Society's stance on user anonymity on the internet.
It is my opinion that an alias can allow us to share feelings we have without trying to conform to society's expectation of us. Furthermore, without anonymity, the internet would offer nothing new. Schalos (talk) 20:18, 8 November 2010 (UTC)
- Yet with anonymity comes all kinds of problems, people hiding behind false identities, and the general believe that nothing which happens on the internet matters. When you remove your identity, the notion follows, you are immune to anything and everything. Which is largely a myth perpetuated by the idea that most people are either too lazy to care or don't know how to find out someone's identity.--68.6.182.39 (talk) 22:00, 2 March 2012 (UTC)
External Links
Can we get a consensus to remove the external links to the chapters? There is a tag on that section, but before I remove what looks like a lot of hard work, I want to make certain that it is appropriate, and that I am interpreting Wikipedia's external link policy correctly. Lynden Price (talk) 18:05, 29 November 2013 (UTC)
New NEWS today, for future editing
Is this the proper Wikipedia article for this discussion?
Headline-1: GOP cannot give in to Obama's 'great Internet giveaway'
QUOTE: "The government's job is simple: to protect freedom and promote free markets. And the Republican Party — which currently controls both chambers of the U.S. Congress — bills itself as the party of individual responsibility and economic growth" -- Charles Edwin Shipp (talk) 00:14, 23 June 2015 (UTC) -- PS: FYI for future editing.
External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Internet Society. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080217060615/http://www.isoc.org/educpillar/ to http://www.isoc.org/educpillar/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:35, 15 November 2017 (UTC)
training and IPv6 .. only issues?
. . .
This page reads rather ... public relationsish.
For example, the only references I can find on this Wikipedia page under "issues" relate to training and IPv6 implementation. There is a lack of other major events in ISOC history that would seem fairly essential to reader understanding of where the society fits into global internet governance.
Here's a few more issues here.