Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/RevengeOfTheRobots

RevengeOfTheRobots

RevengeOfTheRobots (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)

For archived investigations, see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/RevengeOfTheRobots/Archive.

01 June 2018

– A user has requested CheckUser. An SPI clerk will shortly look at the case and endorse or decline the request.

Suspected sockpuppets

• Benprecious (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
• Justjulesjustjules (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)

• Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

Possible use of sockpuppets/meatpuppets to stack votes at an AfD and edit an article. The suspected sockmaster (User:RevengeOfTheRobots) is a relatively old account that returned to the Wikipedia mainspace with the creation of the articles Frank Rouas [1] and JRP Collection Paris [2], both created on 29 May. When other editors began to question whether or not RevengeOfTheRobots has a conflict of interest or not (on the basis that they had personal access to photos of Frank Rouas, claimed the logo of JRP Collection Paris as their own work, repeatedly removed maintenance templates, etc), two new editors arrived on scene at the two articles in question. User:Benprecious edited [3] the Frank Rouas article and Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Frank Rouas, while User:Justjulesjustjules edited [4] the Frank Rouas AfD (their first ever edit) and edited [5] the JRP Collection Paris article. Both editors created their accounts on 31 May and made their first and only edits to subjects RevengeOfTheRobots edited; the likelyhood of new, unbiased editors finding their way to obscure articles and AfDs is highly improbable. Checkuser will be needed to determined whether it is a sock or meat puppet situation, though the reviewing admin could also take action using the duck test. SamHolt6 (talk) 00:36, 1 June 2018 (UTC)

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

This is a vicious attack against me and my work. A witch hunt in which I will be found innocent.

---