User talk:Matthew: Difference between revisions
please give the rfa a chance |
|||
Line 28: | Line 28: | ||
:::This is getting beyond absurd. -- [[User:Ned Scott|Ned Scott]] 08:57, 29 October 2006 (UTC) |
:::This is getting beyond absurd. -- [[User:Ned Scott|Ned Scott]] 08:57, 29 October 2006 (UTC) |
||
== please give the rfa a chance == |
|||
2000 edits with no real problems (check my history) [[User:Rewired|Rewired]] 18:02, 29 October 2006 (UTC) |
Revision as of 18:02, 29 October 2006
Archives | |
---|---|
Archive #1 | Here |
Please leave your message below. Be aware that discussions are archived periodically when believed to be over so if you can not find something you wish to revive please check the archives.
'sup?
Sup? -- Peppery [ userpage | talk] 07:28, 29 October 2006 (UTC)
4400 WikiProject
Just because you're mad at me for supporting a delete of those episodes, and removing a policy violating recommendation from the WikiProject, does not give you the right to make false accusations. The policy that Wikipedia is not an episode guide overrides a goal that you alone added to a WikiProject. That which violates policy and does not have a consensus to back it up does not need a consensus to change it. I have done nothing wrong and I find it highly absurd (and ironic) that you are finding my edits rude. You disagree with me on some stuff, and that's ok. Don't behave like this just because of some disagreements, trying to take such an absurd low blow. -- Ned Scott 08:30, 29 October 2006 (UTC)
- Ned, I strongly urge you to please re-read WP:CIVIL. --Elonka 08:42, 29 October 2006 (UTC)
- I haven't said anything uncivil. -- Ned Scott 08:57, 29 October 2006 (UTC)
- This is getting beyond absurd. -- Ned Scott 08:57, 29 October 2006 (UTC)
please give the rfa a chance
2000 edits with no real problems (check my history) Rewired 18:02, 29 October 2006 (UTC)