Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zoophilia: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Sillydragon (talk | contribs) |
keep |
||
| Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
*'''Keep''' [[Zoophilia]]. '''Delete''' [[User talk:Ciz|the vandal]]. --[[User:Fubar Obfusco|FOo]] 23:04, 15 Dec 2004 (UTC) |
*'''Keep''' [[Zoophilia]]. '''Delete''' [[User talk:Ciz|the vandal]]. --[[User:Fubar Obfusco|FOo]] 23:04, 15 Dec 2004 (UTC) |
||
*'''Keep''' [[User:Sillydragon|Sillydragon]] 23:20, 15 Dec 2004 (UTC) |
*'''Keep''' [[User:Sillydragon|Sillydragon]] 23:20, 15 Dec 2004 (UTC) |
||
*'''Keep''': last I checked, losing a ten page debate on the article's talk page wasn't grounds for deletion. [[User:ShaneKing|Shane King]] 23:37, Dec 15, 2004 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 23:37, 15 December 2004
This page blatantly promotes bestiality ("zoophilia") and uses fake words like 'zoosexual.' --Ciz 18:23, 15 Dec 2004 (UTC)
- After reading User talk:Ciz it seems some sort of temporary ban may be in order for User:Ciz?
- Keep. Controversy and POV are not reasons for deletion. [[User:Poccil|Peter O. (Talk, automation script)]] 18:37, Dec 15, 2004 (UTC)
- Keep - A very thorough article. Seems fairly NPOV to me. Someone's put a lot of work into this article, I see no reason to throw it away. Satori 18:38, Dec 15, 2004 (UTC)
- Keep, notable. Wyss 18:42, 15 Dec 2004 (UTC)
- Keep - it is a matter of standing tradition that Wikipedia is not censored by topic or bowdlerized. Iff the page has POV problems, they should be fixed. - RedWordSmith 18:56, Dec 15, 2004 (UTC)
- Keep. This VfD nom is the perfect case for rejection and de-listing within 24 hours. [[User:GRider|GRider\talk]] 19:01, 15 Dec 2004 (UTC)
- Keep. [[User:Xezbeth|Xezbeth]] 19:03, 15 Dec 2004 (UTC)
- Keep. Ciz needs a bit of education. Agree with GRider. --jpgordon∇∆∇∆ 19:25, 15 Dec 2004 (UTC)
- Keep and keep a watchful eye on Ciz for further actions of this nature. -- Antaeus Feldspar 21:32, 15 Dec 2004 (UTC)
- Keep. Just because you don't like the topic of an article is not grounds to delete it. Read articles about less disgusting things if this isn't the kind of thing you want to read about. But at Wikipedia we don't make value judgments on our topics so it's going to stay. [[User:Livajo|Ливай | ☺]] 21:54, 15 Dec 2004 (UTC)
- Keep and note that Ciz is currently facing the sharp end of an ArbCom request for a complete wikipedia ban, having gone through "Vandalism in progress", RFC, mediation, two 24 hour sysop bans, caused two vprot lockdowns of the article for vandalism including mass deletion of books and academic sources, editing of other users comments, multiple obsessive personal attacks on furrys, and libellous personal attacks on users talk pages and in article talk pages. Vote for presentation to ArbCom was: 9 for, 0 against. FT2 22:20, Dec 15, 2004 (UTC)
- Keep. This VfD is just another abuse of this wiki by a chronic POV-pusher. JAQ 22:39, 15 Dec 2004 (UTC)
- Keep Zoophilia. Delete the vandal. --FOo 23:04, 15 Dec 2004 (UTC)
- Keep Sillydragon 23:20, 15 Dec 2004 (UTC)
- Keep: last I checked, losing a ten page debate on the article's talk page wasn't grounds for deletion. Shane King 23:37, Dec 15, 2004 (UTC)