Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Christine Jax

Christine Jax

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

• How to contribute
• Introduction to deletion process
• Guide to deletion (glossary)
• Help, my article got nominated for deletion!

Christine Jax (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The article is supported almost exclusively by primary sources, press releases, and other websites published by Jax's employers and other affiliated groups. There are very few reliable independent secondary sources that even mention Jax, and those that do are exclusively about a 2012 run for elected office as a member of the Palm Beach County school board. I couldn't even find a source indicating whether she won. The independent source with the most content about this individual can be found here; it's about how, during the school board election, it came to light that Jax had helped her husband publish a salacious website with images of scantily clad women. She falls well short of WP:POLITICIAN. --Dr. Fleischman (talk) 19:35, 26 June 2018 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. MarginalCost (talk) 20:02, 26 June 2018 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. MarginalCost (talk) 20:02, 26 June 2018 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. MarginalCost (talk) 20:02, 26 June 2018 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Minnesota-related deletion discussions. MarginalCost (talk) 20:02, 26 June 2018 (UTC)

CONFLICT OF INTEREST FROM THIS EDITOR

DrFleishchman just wants to get rid of anything I've touched now bc I'm new to wiki and made the egregious faux pas of not disclosing a relationship to the subject I was editing. Now he's attempting to rollback any pages I touched because I'm apparently unreliable. I've disclosed myself officially now. The reversions DrFleischman made on this page removed the legitimate sources added months ago. The Minneapolis Star Tribute and Education Week were never affiliates of Jax nor would most people call them unreliable sources. Content from the first goes back 18 years.

RE: "The article is supported almost exclusively by primary sources, press releases, and other websites published by Jax's employers and other affiliated groups. There are very few reliable independent secondary sources that even mention Jax, and those that do are exclusively about a 2012 run for elected office as a member of the Palm Beach County school board. I couldn't even find a source indicating whether she won." She didn't win. DrFleischman removed that content and source citation to the election board. What about the Star Tribute reports about the NAACP lawsuit and the school data website? What about the grant from the Bush Foundation? Also, press releases are not inherently unreliable sources. Welcome to the new world of digital communication.

RE: "the independent source with the most content about this individual can be found here; it's about how, during the school board election, it came to light that Jax had helped her husband publish a salacious website with images of scantily clad women. She falls well short of WP:POLITICIAN." Thank you for citing the salacious story for the Palm Beach Post as your "independent source with the most content". Comment "She falls well short of a politician" is blatantly editorial and an opinion, ironically.

Her page is visited 1x per day on average. That seems like an unlikely candidate for deletion.

I request DrFleischman recuse himself from an additional involvement with my edits as everything I touch seems to be considered tainted before any attempt is made to work through improvements with me or other party editors. --aedixon (talk 22:23, 26 June 2018 (UTC)