User talk:Utzchips: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 18:30, 1 November 2006

Welcome to Wikipedia

Welcome!

Hello, Utzchips, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! --Nehwyn 08:29, 23 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Diabesity

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Diabesity, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. This article appears to be a direct copy from http://www.wordspy.com/words/diabesity.asp, and therefore a copyright violation. The copyrighted text has been or will soon be deleted.

If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL), you can comment to that effect on Talk:Diabesity. Then you should do one of the following:

Make a note on the original website that re-use is permitted under the GFDL and state at Talk:Diabesity where we can find that note; or
Send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the GFDL, and note that you have done so on Talk:Diabesity.

It is also important that the text be modified to have an encyclopedic tone and that it follows Wikipedia article layout. For more information, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Thank you, and please feel welcome to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Happy editing! -- ReyBrujo 23:01, 28 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Botherder

For this article not to be deleted, you need to cite reliable sources showing that this term is in general use and is not a neologism. Thanks, NawlinWiki 23:45, 28 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Reposted deletions

Please see the "Brad hines" talk page regarding my suggestion to you. Also, please do not try and skirt around the deletion by tweaking the name of the article as this may be viewed as vandalism. Thanks. - Lucky 6.9 00:46, 29 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Brad hines

To contact someone (Lucky, for example), please edit their "talk" page rather than their user page. If you need any help, please feel free to contact me. Thanks. --TheOtherBob 01:23, 29 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Well, I did a quick investigation, and apparently it's been reviewed several times by several different editors, and all of them thought that the person was insufficiently notable to be included in wikipedia (I believe that one felt that it was an advertisement as well). I think it's been deleted about 7-8 times, going back to April. Essentially, to be included in Wikipedia the person has to be notable - which means that they need to be well-known, important, or significant. The people who have reviewed it don't think this person meets that standard. I tend to agree - in part because the people who reviewed it have quite a bit of experience in the standards involved here, and in part because several different people have agreed that it shouldn't be included. --TheOtherBob 02:03, 29 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Just happened to swing by before hitting the sack and I saw the new contribution. Much better. I'm glad this worked out. - Lucky 6.9 06:39, 1 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

- You betcha.

Lucky 6.9 has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling to someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Smile to others by adding {{subst:smile}}, {{subst:smile2}} or {{subst:smile3}} to their talk page with a friendly message. Happy editing!

Brad hines

A tag has been placed on Brad hines, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable (see the guidelines for notability here). If you can indicate why the subject of this article is notable, you may contest the tagging. To do this, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself.

Please read the criteria for speedy deletion (specifically, article #7) and our general biography criteria. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. --Oneiros 10:37, 1 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

sign your posts

Thank you. I am new to this. But anyway, the Brad Hines entry should stay. There is much more fortifying information to put in respects to his capacity as a domain name industry shaker and as an art/education contributor that isn't up yet. Let me know. Kindly, Utz --Utzchips 10:59, 1 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you!--Oneiros 10:56, 1 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning.
The next time you create an inappropriate page such as Brad hines, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. NawlinWiki 18:25, 1 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, but what is appearing as edits on the two articles are just random bits of nonsense text. If you are going to recreate the article, do it coherently, please. NawlinWiki 18:28, 1 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I will do so. I am new at wikipedia, still getting the hang of it. I keep getting the damn article pulled on before I can finish it lol.

Revision as of 18:28, 1 November 2006 edit NawlinWiki (talk \| contribs) Edit filter managers, Administrators 221,643 edits →sign your posts: response ← Previous edit		Revision as of 18:30, 1 November 2006 edit undo Utzchips (talk \| contribs) 66 edits No edit summary Next edit →
Line 62:		Line 62:

	Yes, but what is appearing as edits on the two articles are just random bits of nonsense text. If you are going to recreate the article, do it coherently, please. [[User:NawlinWiki\|NawlinWiki]] 18:28, 1 November 2006 (UTC)		Yes, but what is appearing as edits on the two articles are just random bits of nonsense text. If you are going to recreate the article, do it coherently, please. [[User:NawlinWiki\|NawlinWiki]] 18:28, 1 November 2006 (UTC)

			I will do so. I am new at wikipedia, still getting the hang of it. I keep getting the damn article pulled on before I can finish it lol.