Jump to content

User talk:Chsf: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
[[EXILE]]: Flying squirrels
Mahawiki (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 132: Line 132:
==Flying squirrels==
==Flying squirrels==
Please note that there is neither a consensus in the wikipedia community nor in the scientific community as to whether common names of mammals should be capitalised. I personally don't care and these pages can move back and forth all they want as long as it's done properly (i.e. moving the page instead of cut and paste jobs). I can almost guarantee that in a few months someone will move it back. You were definitely right to fix "Old World Flying Squirrels" to "Old World flying squirrels", though. --[[User:Aranae|Aranae]] 17:21, 27 October 2006 (UTC)
Please note that there is neither a consensus in the wikipedia community nor in the scientific community as to whether common names of mammals should be capitalised. I personally don't care and these pages can move back and forth all they want as long as it's done properly (i.e. moving the page instead of cut and paste jobs). I can almost guarantee that in a few months someone will move it back. You were definitely right to fix "Old World Flying Squirrels" to "Old World flying squirrels", though. --[[User:Aranae|Aranae]] 17:21, 27 October 2006 (UTC)

: Instead of bothering because of frivolous complaints (?) of my opposers I would request u to block [[usre:sarvagnya]] for his provocation and sockpuppetry.(note that he too has many things in kannada on his talk page)

:[[User:Arya_Rajya_Maharashtra]] was blocked for sockpuppetry why isnt '''confirmed''' sarvagnya?

:There is a limit of injustice. I refuse to oblige unless u follow the same set of rules while dealing with 'other' editors.Thank you.
:[[User:Mahawiki|Mahawiki]] 04:29, 2 November 2006 (UTC)

Revision as of 04:29, 2 November 2006

Welcome!

Hi Chsf, and a warm welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you have enjoyed editing as much as I did so far and decide to stay. Unfamiliar with the features and workings of Wikipedia? Don't fret! Be Bold! Here's some good links for your reference and that'll get you started in no time!

Most Wikipedians would prefer to just work on articles of their own interest. But if you have some free time to spare, here are some open tasks that you may want to help out :

  • RC Patrol - Keeping a lookout for vandalism.
  • Cleanup - Help make unreadable articles readable.
  • Requests - Wanted on WP, but hasn't been created.
  • Merge - Combining duplicate articles into one.
  • Wikiprojects - So many to join, so many to choose from...Take your pick!

Oh yes, don't forget to sign when you write on talk pages, simply type four tildes, like this: ~~~~. This will automatically add your name and the time after your comments. And finally, if you have any questions or doubts, don't hesitate to contact me on my talk page. Once again, welcome! =)

- Mailer Diablo 14:31, 9 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]


BoA Albums

Thanks so much! I wasn't the one who put it originally as the triple-A side title (from an edit that was probably made months ago), but when I get around to making the article I'll make mention of it(I'm working from Everlasting backwards). Thanks again!


Yajimari21 01:19, 19 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I suggest you revisit this one. Looks like you cut&pasted from your previous one, and forgot to update the track listing, which still refers to Lies. I'll leave it to you to fix, as I have no actual knowledge to be 100% certain there was a mistake, just a gut feeling that it doesn't look right as is. :) - TexasAndroid 19:09, 9 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for noticing that and alerting me! Yes, it was indeed a cut-n-paste error ^_^ Chsf 23:30, 9 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]


Capitalisation

Look here and here for help with capitlisation.Jizz 17:13, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Monica Lewinsky

chsf is hereby awarded this Barnstar of Good Humor for contributions to Word Association, additions that made BrianSmithson laugh out loud, thus prompting odd stares from coworkers. 25 January 2006

Nice. — BrianSmithson 18:15, 25 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

WP:H!P

Consider yourself signed up :)

WP:H!P is on!

WikiProject Hello! Project is now a go!

This week's opening agenda:

  • Rainbow 7 will be in my P.O. box tomorrow morning. I'll expand on the article once I get the CD in my hot little hands, probably by tomorrow night.
  • WP:H!P member User:Sploggers (talk) created a stub for Hello! Project articles. Try to stub as many articles as necessary, especially articles for H!P recordings and participants that need to be created. The stub has already been "discovered" by deletecruft folk so we have to make use of it, although I've already been debating pretty much successfully in support of it. Again, though, much respect to Brother Sploggers for creating it.
  • The project page is up and running at the wikilink above. Please feel free to "nominate" any articles that need to be created and/or expanded in the appropriate subcategories on the Project Page.
  • Does anyone want to create an "I Support Aibon" userbox (as a subpage of their user page or maybe even the project page) for while Ms. Kago is on her forced hiatus?

Any further questions or suggestions, ask me directly or make the suggestion on the project's talk page.

Ganbare, CJ Marsicano 02:31, 17 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Sakuragumii & Otomegumi releases

Hey, great cleanup work on Lovely's article. Only thing: The four splinter group releases are technically EP's (not singles) as there's more than two vocal tracks on them. I've already made that correction already — just keep the distinction in mind for future edits ;) --CJ Marsicano 15:11, 25 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

As you noted here, sources and other references have been added to the article and it is up for featured article status. Thanks for helping push your fellow Wikipedians! :) —Eternal Equinox | talk 19:57, 15 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding User:Cquest and his edits of Brownstone (group)

(also known as 24.126.191.129) I don't know what to do about this case, he keep removing parts from the article on Brownstone (group), and I've told him that if he feels that there should be separate article for the information he keeps removing. His general attitude towards the woman in question - Nicole Gilbert - is "MAKE A SEPERATE PAGE FOR NICCI FOR HER INFO!!!!!"/"Make a seperate page for Nicci to speak on her", but obviously he's got something against the woman in question, as he claimed: "who cares what nicci does now" and "i dont care about a seperate showing for nicci". I think if we follow logical reasoning it is the person who wants something removed from an article who has to make the new, separate entry on Wikipedia as other editors are most likely not going to be watching that article 24/7 and as time goes by many other edits to the article might have been done, making it more difficult to discover what has been removed from the article.

Basically I'm in need of some input from other editors on this issue as it is on the verge of becoming an editing war (if it hasn't already become one), and I feel already uneasy enough about reverting and rewriting his edits all the time. Thanks. Oh, and if this isn't the place to discuss this kind of issues please tell me where I can do to so. - chsf 13:59, 20 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I rolled back his latest revert and made a redlink for Nicole Gilbert. I think we should suggest to him that he work on that independent article. Fred Bauder 14:14, 20 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
This is the wrong place. Please take this to Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents. You should not block this person yourself as you seem quite involved and heated. Fred Bauder 14:23, 20 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Getwiki

You voted keep on the deletion vote. Cyde deleted it when the votes for either opinion were equal which is quiet bbizarre. If it is ok with you then let's take it to deletion review? Hope to here from you asap. Unitedroad 06:32, 22 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your message. I see, you're right! I had not checked all the edits. Now I see that it was just a nasty person who wanted to make trouble. I did not change the other edits made by him because I had no idea of the truth of those those statements. It's good that you removed them. All the best, EuroSong talk 20:20, 1 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

re: Regarding your revert of Lady Sovereign

Quote: "rv - may be a good edit, but repeated vandal has lost credibility". In my opinion the user whose contribution you reverted is as credible as anyone else when it comes to the article about Lady Sovereign, the user has as far as I can see not been engaged in vandalisation of the article. Thus I think it is unnecessary to remove information that neither appears to be slanderous nor false. - Chsf 14:46, 3 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

OK, I apologize - the problem is that the user was vandalizing other articles, so I assumed their edits to this one were vandalism. Please feel free to put it back. -Patstuart 14:48, 3 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

GFDLvio edits stop please

see Help:Moving a page--Geejo 13:01, 7 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The Diana Ross page

I don't know what's up with that Thomas Lewis dude, but I didn't see nothing wrong in the edited Diana Ross page. I don't like seeing lines like "no international pop icon escape controversies" and blah, blah, blah... I bet he's the same dude who wrote "The Diva Ascends" and all of that. Yo, how can we find a way around this article to be both a musical evaluation of Diane and also a look at many issues that have had Diane at fault like the J5 drama and the Supremes' drama. Holla at your boy if you can. -- BrothaTimothy 06:17 (UTC).

Wording

Oh sorry, hehe. I was trying out a new tool i just realised i had, didnt know what it did till now.. it checks recent changes and corrects typos. thanks/Fenton, Matthew Lexic Dark 52278 Alpha 771 19:16, 16 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Matthew Fenton

I have been engaged in a massive reversion war with Matthew Fenton; from comments in his talk page, looks like he's been giving you the same treatment. Just wanted to drop by and express my sympathy.

Tjic 11:54, 19 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Warning

It is important to keep a cool head, especially when responding to comments against you or your edits. Personal attacks and disruptive comments only escalate a situation; please keep calm and remember that action can be taken against other parties if necessary. Attacking another user back can only satisfy trolls or anger contributors and leads to general bad feeling. Please try to remain civil with your comments. Thanks!

I thought Exile was a 5-member group? I guess I was wrong. It's actually three vocalists and five dancers. I don't know much about them but I doubt that they are a boyband, which is why I edited the Koda Kumi page the way I did. Their music is totally different from bubblegum pop and they're way too old to be a boyband. mirageinred 19:39, 25 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Flying squirrels

Please note that there is neither a consensus in the wikipedia community nor in the scientific community as to whether common names of mammals should be capitalised. I personally don't care and these pages can move back and forth all they want as long as it's done properly (i.e. moving the page instead of cut and paste jobs). I can almost guarantee that in a few months someone will move it back. You were definitely right to fix "Old World Flying Squirrels" to "Old World flying squirrels", though. --Aranae 17:21, 27 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Instead of bothering because of frivolous complaints (?) of my opposers I would request u to block usre:sarvagnya for his provocation and sockpuppetry.(note that he too has many things in kannada on his talk page)
User:Arya_Rajya_Maharashtra was blocked for sockpuppetry why isnt confirmed sarvagnya?
There is a limit of injustice. I refuse to oblige unless u follow the same set of rules while dealing with 'other' editors.Thank you.
Mahawiki 04:29, 2 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]