Jump to content

Body fat percentage: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary
Fleiger (talk | contribs)
rv
Line 23: Line 23:
[[DEXA|Dual Energy X-ray absorptiometry]], or DXA (formerly DEXA), is a good method for measuring body fat percentage.
[[DEXA|Dual Energy X-ray absorptiometry]], or DXA (formerly DEXA), is a good method for measuring body fat percentage.


There are several more complicated procedures that more accurately determine body fat percentage. Some, referred to as multicompartment models, can include DXA measurement of bone, plus independent measures of body water (using the dilution principle with isotopically labeled water) and body volume (either by water displacement or air plethsmography). Various other components may be indepen
There are several more complicated procedures that more accurately determine body fat percentage. Some, referred to as multicompartment models, can include DXA measurement of bone, plus independent measures of body water (using the dilution principle with isotopically labeled water) and body volume (either by water displacement or air plethsmography). Various other components may be independently measures, such as total body potassium.

In addition, the most refined method, in-vivo neutron activation, can quantify all the elements of the body and use mathematical relations among the measured elements in the different components of the body (fat, water, protein, etc.) to develop simultaneous equations to estimate total body composition, including body fat. This is the most accurate method.


===Body average density measurement===
===Body average density measurement===

Revision as of 04:37, 4 November 2006

Body fat percentage is the fraction of the total body mass that is adipose tissue. This index is often used as a means to monitor progress during a diet or as a measure of physical fitness for certain sports, such as body building. It is more accurate as a measure of health than body mass index (BMI) since it directly measures body composition and there are separate body fat guidelines for men and women. However, its popularity is less than BMI because most of the techniques used to measure body fat percentage require equipment and skills that are not readily available.

Recommendations

The American Council on Exercise[1] has associated categories with ranges of body fat. Women generally have less muscle mass than men and therefore they have a higher body fat percentage range for each category.

Description Women Men
Essential fat 10–13% 2–5%
Athletes 14–20% 6–13%
Fitness 21–24% 14–17%
Acceptable 25–31% 18–24%
Obesity 32%+ 25%+

Measurement techniques

Dual energy X-ray absorptiometry

Dual Energy X-ray absorptiometry, or DXA (formerly DEXA), is a good method for measuring body fat percentage.

There are several more complicated procedures that more accurately determine body fat percentage. Some, referred to as multicompartment models, can include DXA measurement of bone, plus independent measures of body water (using the dilution principle with isotopically labeled water) and body volume (either by water displacement or air plethsmography). Various other components may be independently measures, such as total body potassium.

In addition, the most refined method, in-vivo neutron activation, can quantify all the elements of the body and use mathematical relations among the measured elements in the different components of the body (fat, water, protein, etc.) to develop simultaneous equations to estimate total body composition, including body fat. This is the most accurate method.

Body average density measurement

Prior to the adoption of DXA, the most accurate method of determining body fat percentage was to weigh a person underwater in order to obtain the average density (mass per unit volume). Since fat tissue has a lower density than muscles and bones, it is possible to estimate the fat content. This estimate is distorted by the fact that muscles and bones have different densities: for a person with a more-than-average amount of bone tissue, the estimate will be too low. However, this method gives highly reproducible results for individual persons (± 1%), unlike the methods discussed below, which can have an error up to ±10%.[2] The body fat percentage is commonly calculated from one of two formulas:

  • Brozek formula: BF = (4.57/ρ − 4.142) × 100
  • Siri formula is: BF = (4.95/ρ − 4.50) × 100

In these formulas, ρ is the body density in kg/L. For a more accurate measurement, the amount of bone tissue must be estimated with a separate procedure. In either case, the body density must be measured with a high accuracy. An error of just 0.2% (e.g. 150 mL of trapped air in the lungs) would make 1% difference in the body fat percentage. The body density is measured by weighing a person underwater, with all air expelled from the lungs. This procedure is normally carried out in laboratories with special equipment. However, it is possible to make an estimation without assistance in a swimming pool. A person who neither floats nor sinks with empty lungs in a swimming pool would have a density of 1 kg/dm3 and an estimated body fat percentage of 43% (Brozek) or 45% (Siri), which would be extremely obese. Persons with a lower body fat percentage would need to hold some kind of floatation device, such as an empty bottle, in order to prevent them from sinking. If the floatation device has mass m and volume v, and the person has a mass M, then his or her density is

where is the density of water [0.99780 kg/L at 22 °C (72 °F)]. For example, a person weighing 80 kg needs to hold a floater with a volume of 4.5 L and a mass of 0.5 kg has a density of 1.05 kg/L and hence a body fat percentage of 21%. Note that both the Brozek and Siri formulas are claimed to give systematically too high body fat percentages. [3]

Skinfold test

A simpler test for measuring body fat is the skinfold test, whereby a pinch of skin is precisely measured by calipers at several standardized points on the body to determine the subcutaneous fat layer thickness. These measurements are converted to body fat percentage by an equation. The test's accuracy is critically dependent on its application. For instance, the fold locations must be found accurately, and the calipers should be applied with fixed pressure. It can be useful as a measure of body composition change over a period of time provided the test is carried out by the same person with the same technique, although it may not give an accurate reading of body fat percentage.

Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis (BIA)

This method can be conducted accurately in the laboratory or at home with less accuracy, though this version is more affordable. The general principle behind BIA: two conductors are attached to a person's body and a small electrical charge is sent through the body. The resistance between the conductors will provide a measure of body fat, since the resistance to electricity varies between adipose, muscular and skeletal tissue. Criticism of this methodology is based on where the conductors are placed on the body; typically they are placed on the feet, with the current sent up one leg, across the abdomen and down the other leg. As men and women store fat differently around the abdomen and thigh region, the results can be less accurate as a measure of total body fat percentage. Another variable that can affect the amount of body fat this test measures is the amount of liquid an individual has consumed before the test. As electricity travels more easily through water, a person who has consumed a large amount of water before the test will measure as a lower body fat percentage. Less water will increase the percentage of body fat.

From weight and waist

There exist formulae for calculating body fat percentage from an individual's weight and waist line measurements. Unfortunately, these are usually very inaccurate and provide little advantage over BMI measurements.

External links