Jump to content

User:A.ivkovic/OLES2129: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
A.ivkovic (talk | contribs)
new activity
A.ivkovic (talk | contribs)
activity 2
Line 18: Line 18:


Finally, the article is a good length for its subject matter. It provides important details as well as some interesting side notes, but avoids going into unnecessary detail.
Finally, the article is a good length for its subject matter. It provides important details as well as some interesting side notes, but avoids going into unnecessary detail.

Activity 2:

[[User:A.ivkovic/OLES2129/draft#History]]

Revision as of 08:54, 27 August 2018

Week 4

Activity 1 - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Telchur

Things that could be done to improve the Stub-class: Adding more citations that support the information in each paragraph, using more reliable sources to support claims, removing ambiguous claims "is thought to have" and more information could be included to create equal subsections.

Activity 2 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robin_Partington

Week 5

Activity 1:

Cloud Gate presents many of the key qualities that are sought in a featured article. It is of high and reliable quality. Using clear, concise and professional language. Furthermore, the article presents a neutral view point of view, presenting both criticism and support of the sculpture. It has comprehensive coverage of major facts and context. Also, with the amount of citations it uses therefore it is factual and provides the means necessary to verify it. There is a total of 83 citations and 5 published texts referenced in the bibliography. However, there is some disconnection as there is a separate reference list and bibliography that don’t include the same texts. The article is quite broad with five key sections and does not go into any unnecessary detail. The article is also quite stable, there is no evidence on any ongoing editing wars and the content is not changing regularly.  The last edit was on the 28thof March this year. Therefore, it is presenting current and stable content.

Style wise it is compliant with the manual of style, it has a concise lead, a 8 point table of contents and is formatted in a clear manner.

Regarding media, it uses a total of 5 pictures which add to the article very positively. They are also all referenced and abide by copyright standards.

Finally, the article is a good length for its subject matter. It provides important details as well as some interesting side notes, but avoids going into unnecessary detail.

Activity 2:

User:A.ivkovic/OLES2129/draft#History