Talk:Passing off: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 23:47, 6 November 2006

Passed off pissed off passin' all over the place

Ok, ok, so there's this guy. He's is ...like super pissed at me. Well, it's his own damn fault.

Here I was minding my own business, trying to track down the creeps who rooked me for $15k on this aluminum "lifetime" roof. I mean , It has always leaked, there have been various folks come to goo it and poke at it with a stick and what not. I think one guy was up there waving a chicken bone over it. The one honest guy we never saw again said it needed00 ripped off and redone. then they just stopped coming.

But I digress.

The meat of the story is that this pissed off guy was using my home (the one with the Temporal Interior Waterfall, courtesy of one of Fin-All/delta /Internatioal Exteriors roofing family of revolving shady operators) as one of his company's (or manufacturer he represents) installations.

Imagine my suprise! My leaky roof! Right there on this guy's website!

First he said he had absolutely no connection with those guys. I said fine. tell me where ya got da pix! Now he wants to hide where he got the photos from.

The kicker is.......I never told any of these tin men that they could use photos of my home.

I can't even get them to come fix the roof on it.

He's pissed all right. I posted his company info just like the rest of 'em.

He said he'll sick his lawyer on me, so I call mine. First my Lawyer sais that the copy right on an image of my home is only as clear as the image. I tell him it's pretty damn clear. My guy laughs and sais "For whatis he gonna sue ya? if anyone had some permission by extension, He put his own %&& in there, by using those other guys' stuff and an image of your home without permission" wet.avenger@yahoo.com

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was PAGE MOVED per request. -GTBacchus^(talk) 23:47, 6 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move

Passing off (legal term) → Passing off — Put article back where it came from. Article was moved because someone thought that it needed to make way for a disambig page. It later turned out that the other terms were not 'Passing off' but 'Passing', so if the current disambig page was cleaned strictly according to MoS:DP, it would meet WP:SPEEDY. AliceJMarkham 07:02, 2 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Survey

Add * '''Support''' or * '''Oppose''' on a new line followed by a brief explanation, then sign your opinion using ~~~~.

Support reason given in request says it all. --AliceJMarkham 07:06, 2 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Support per nom. Clackmannanshireman 01:29, 5 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Abstain: This is one of those many occasions where the move should just be done. No need for a vote. Paul Beardsell 03:58, 5 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion

Add any additional comments: I agree with Paul, but was uncertain whether there might be any controversy. I would otherwise have put it into 'uncontroversial moves'. I believe that we can declare consensus. --AliceJMarkham 05:33, 5 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
-{{move|Passing off}}
 Passed off pissed off passin' all over the place
@@ Line 25: / Line 23: @@
 wet.avenger@yahoo.com
+<div class="boilerplate" style="background-color: #efe; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px dotted #aaa;"><!-- Template:polltop -->
+:''The following discussion is an archived debate of the {{{type|proposal}}}. <font color="red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</font> Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section. ''
+{{{result|The result of the debate was}}} '''PAGE MOVED''' per request. -[[User:GTBacchus|GTBacchus]]<sup>([[User talk:GTBacchus|talk]])</sup> 23:47, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
 == Requested move ==
 [[Passing off (legal term)]] → [[Passing off]] — Put article back where it came from. Article was moved because someone thought that it needed to make way for a disambig page. It later turned out that the other terms were not 'Passing off' but 'Passing', so if the current disambig page was cleaned strictly according to [[MoS:DP]], it would meet [[WP:SPEEDY]]. [[User:AliceJMarkham|AliceJMarkham]] 07:02, 2 November 2006 (UTC)
@@ Line 37: / Line 39: @@
 Add any additional comments:
 I agree with Paul, but was uncertain whether there might be any controversy. I would otherwise have put it into 'uncontroversial moves'. I believe that we can declare consensus. --[[User:AliceJMarkham|AliceJMarkham]] 05:33, 5 November 2006 (UTC)
+:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  <font color="red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</font> Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.</div><!-- Template:pollbottom -->