Jump to content

User talk:2001:569:77E2:3900:9115:BBCD:ECF5:53FB: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Line 18: Line 18:
:::::::::Uhm... I've been doing that and you know it. Please stop showing off your stupidity.[[Special:Contributions/2001:569:77E2:3900:9115:BBCD:ECF5:53FB|2001:569:77E2:3900:9115:BBCD:ECF5:53FB]] ([[User talk:2001:569:77E2:3900:9115:BBCD:ECF5:53FB#top|talk]]) 22:16, 15 October 2018 (UTC)
:::::::::Uhm... I've been doing that and you know it. Please stop showing off your stupidity.[[Special:Contributions/2001:569:77E2:3900:9115:BBCD:ECF5:53FB|2001:569:77E2:3900:9115:BBCD:ECF5:53FB]] ([[User talk:2001:569:77E2:3900:9115:BBCD:ECF5:53FB#top|talk]]) 22:16, 15 October 2018 (UTC)
:::::::::I'm merely suggesting that the articleTalk page is the best place to discuss something. I'm not quite sure why you've now started on personal attacks. I reverted two of your edits because I though you were mistaken and hadn't discussed it at the article Talk page. That's about the size of it. You seem to have jumped in at the deep end over nothing. [[User:Martinevans123|Martinevans123]] ([[User talk:Martinevans123|talk]]) 22:23, 15 October 2018 (UTC)
:::::::::I'm merely suggesting that the articleTalk page is the best place to discuss something. I'm not quite sure why you've now started on personal attacks. I reverted two of your edits because I though you were mistaken and hadn't discussed it at the article Talk page. That's about the size of it. You seem to have jumped in at the deep end over nothing. [[User:Martinevans123|Martinevans123]] ([[User talk:Martinevans123|talk]]) 22:23, 15 October 2018 (UTC)
::::::::::yOU REVERTED BECAUSE YOU THOUGHT YOU WERE SMART... YOU'RE NOT
::::::::::YOU REVERTED BECAUSE YOU THOUGHT YOU WERE SMART... YOU'RE NOT!
THAT'S WHY YOU NEVER ASKED FORA VALID SOURCE. LIKE WIKIPEDIA DEMANDS. YOU'RE COVERING YOUR TRACKS. YOURE DUMB.[[Special:Contributions/2001:569:77E2:3900:9115:BBCD:ECF5:53FB|2001:569:77E2:3900:9115:BBCD:ECF5:53FB]] ([[User talk:2001:569:77E2:3900:9115:BBCD:ECF5:53FB#top|talk]]) 22:26, 15 October 2018 (UTC)
THAT'S WHY YOU NEVER ASKED FOR A VALID SOURCE. LIKE WIKIPEDIA DEMANDS. YOU'RE COVERING YOUR TRACKS. YOU'RE DUMB.[[Special:Contributions/2001:569:77E2:3900:9115:BBCD:ECF5:53FB|2001:569:77E2:3900:9115:BBCD:ECF5:53FB]] ([[User talk:2001:569:77E2:3900:9115:BBCD:ECF5:53FB#top|talk]]) 22:26, 15 October 2018 (UTC)

Revision as of 22:27, 15 October 2018

October 2018

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Princess Eugenie. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

  1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
  2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Martinevans123 (talk) 21:40, 15 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ya... I currently appear to following Wikipedia policy's and reverting vandalism. Please stop vandalising.2001:569:77E2:3900:9115:BBCD:ECF5:53FB (talk) 21:41, 15 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
You're edit warring instead of discussing at the Talk page. See WP:BRD. Thanks. Martinevans123 (talk) 21:43, 15 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
I'm following Wikipedia's policies for a BLP. Please stop throwing a tantrum and admit you are totally in the wrong.2001:569:77E2:3900:9115:BBCD:ECF5:53FB (talk) 21:44, 15 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
No tantrums here, thanks. Let's just see what other editors think. Kind regards. Martinevans123 (talk) 21:46, 15 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Hasn't it already been protected to stop you breaking policy? 2001:569:77E2:3900:9115:BBCD:ECF5:53FB (talk) 21:47, 15 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
I'm not quite sure why that has happened. I think you'll find it's the other way round for the Talk page. Martinevans123 (talk) 21:49, 15 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Nope... Nope. Nopers! Nopity-nope-nope-noperson! The page definitely still has "of York" upon it. (nd if it doesn't, I'll just complain non-stop till it does)2001:569:77E2:3900:9115:BBCD:ECF5:53FB (talk) 21:54, 15 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
You need to take any complaints, whether "non-stop" or not, to Talk:Princess Eugenie. Thanks. Martinevans123 (talk) 22:00, 15 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Uhm... I've been doing that and you know it. Please stop showing off your stupidity.2001:569:77E2:3900:9115:BBCD:ECF5:53FB (talk) 22:16, 15 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
I'm merely suggesting that the articleTalk page is the best place to discuss something. I'm not quite sure why you've now started on personal attacks. I reverted two of your edits because I though you were mistaken and hadn't discussed it at the article Talk page. That's about the size of it. You seem to have jumped in at the deep end over nothing. Martinevans123 (talk) 22:23, 15 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
YOU REVERTED BECAUSE YOU THOUGHT YOU WERE SMART... YOU'RE NOT!

THAT'S WHY YOU NEVER ASKED FOR A VALID SOURCE. LIKE WIKIPEDIA DEMANDS. YOU'RE COVERING YOUR TRACKS. YOU'RE DUMB.2001:569:77E2:3900:9115:BBCD:ECF5:53FB (talk) 22:26, 15 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]