Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Queplix: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively

← Previous edit Next edit →

Content deleted Content added

VisualWikitext

Inline

Revision as of 04:23, 8 November 2006

Queplix

Not notable Sleepyhead 10:16, 2 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - fails WP:CORP. The number of buzzwords involved also indicates that this is spammy. MER-C 11:31, 2 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per above. --Kf4bdy ^talk ^contribs 23:52, 2 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

AFD relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new discussions below this notice. Thanks, Nishkid 64 20:17, 7 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as per nomination. Article reads spammy/advertisement. Xdenizen 20:39, 7 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per MER-C. There might also be a conflict of interest. The article was created by what I suspect was an SPA. --Brad Beattie ^(talk) 23:34, 7 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Delete Its an advert for sure, outside the scope of Wikipedia scope_creep 00:39, 8 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Do not Delete How is this different from any other article written about any other company? scope_creep 00:39, 8 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 8: / Line 8: @@
 *'''Delete''' per [[User:MER-C|MER-C]]. There might also be a conflict of interest. The article was created by what I suspect was an SPA. --[[User:BradBeattie|Brad Beattie]] <sup><small>[[User talk:BradBeattie|(talk)]]</small></sup> 23:34, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
 *'''Speedy Delete''' Its an advert for sure, outside the scope of Wikipedia [[User:Scope creep|scope_creep]] 00:39, 8 November 2006 (UTC)
+*'''Do not Delete''' How is this different from any other article written about any other company? [[User:Scope creep|scope_creep]] 00:39, 8 November 2006 (UTC)