Talk:Landsverk L-60: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively

← Previous edit Next edit →

Content deleted Content added

VisualWikitext

Inline

Revision as of 15:43, 20 October 2018

Military history: Land vehicles / European / Nordic Start‑class

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

Start

This article has been rated as Start-class on the project's quality scale.

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Military land vehicles task force
	European military history task force
	Nordic military history task force

Template:WikiProject Tanks

Sweden Start‑class Low‑importance

	Sweden portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sweden, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Sweden-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SwedenWikipedia:WikiProject SwedenTemplate:WikiProject SwedenSweden articles
Start	This article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Design influence

I reduced what I thought was some over-claiming on the design influence of this vehicle. Obviously open to correction if I am wrong here but three claims were made:

a) Torsion bar suspension: The L60 appears to be the first *tracked* vehicle to use this suspension, but not the first *vehicle*. Nor am I aware of any evidence linking the L60 to later designs.

b) Welded construction: Hungarian AFVs did not become all-welded during WW2. The Turan and Csaba, for example, were rivetted. Postwar, I am not sure they were building AFVs at all. The USSR and Germany were both making extensive use of welding as early as the 1930s, (see for example the Panzer I, BT-7, or BA-20) so, I am again unsure what connection there can be to the L60.

c) Periscopes replacing vision slits: Tanks worldwide were being equipped with periscopes in the 1930s.

I replaced with text with the word "advanced" since these were certainly advanced features for the era, but being advanced is not the same as influential (other tanks were as advanced).

Regards, DMorpheus2 (talk) 17:56, 21 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

L-60A to D fake designations

L-60A to D seems to be fake since they dont appear in any landsverk document. After some research they seems to originate from the book Tanks of the world 1915-1945. The book probably had bad sources.--Blockhaj (talk) 19:23, 29 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

in service until 2002?

is this a joke or an error?

@@ Line 20: / Line 20: @@
 L-60A to D seems to be fake since they dont appear in any landsverk document. After some research they seems to originate from the book Tanks of the world 1915-1945. The book probably had bad sources.--[[User:Blockhaj|Blockhaj]] ([[User talk:Blockhaj|talk]]) 19:23, 29 May 2018 (UTC)
+== in service until 2002? ==
+is this a joke or an error?