User:Giezellebriseno/sandbox: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 26: | Line 26: | ||
Is each fact referenced with an appropriate, reliable reference? Where does the information come from? Are these neutral sources? If biased, is that bias noted? |
Is each fact referenced with an appropriate, reliable reference? Where does the information come from? Are these neutral sources? If biased, is that bias noted? |
||
-I do not think every fact is referenced with an appropriate, reliable reference. Also I believe most are neutral sources. |
|||
- |
|||
What kinds of conversations, if any, are going on behind the scenes about how to represent this topic? |
What kinds of conversations, if any, are going on behind the scenes about how to represent this topic? |
||
-I saw somebody talking about the need to revise this oral tradition article, they stated that the article is extremely long and before more information is added it needs to be revised and broken down to make to more understandable and easy to point out key details. |
|||
- |
|||
How is the article rated? Is it a part of any WikiProjects? |
How is the article rated? Is it a part of any WikiProjects? |
||
- The article is rated on average 1-10 probably like a 5. No it is not part if any Wikiprojects. |
|||
- |
|||
Revision as of 19:42, 24 October 2018
Article Evaluation
 | This is a user sandbox of Giezellebriseno. You can use it for testing or practicing edits. This is not the sandbox where you should draft your assigned article for a dashboard.wikiedu.org course. To find the right sandbox for your assignment, visit your Dashboard course page and follow the Sandbox Draft link for your assigned article in the My Articles section. |
Is everything in the article relevant to the article topic? Is there anything that distracted you?
- I'm not to sure if everything in this article is relevant, Something that distracted me in the article was the " Transmission", I read it and didn't seem to understand the point of it.
Is any information out of date? Is anything missing that could be added?
- Yes, something major that I noticed that wasn't talked about is African American oral tradition.
What else could be improved ?
- Something that could be improved is bringing it up to date, It gives me old vibes, so really just updating it.
Is the article neutral? Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position?
- After reading the article, overall it seemed to be a very neutral article, I didn't catch any claims that appeared heavily biased towards a specific position.
Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented?
- Yes, in my opinion there are viewpoints that are underrespresented, such as African Americans oral tradition.
Check a few citations. Do the links work? Does the source support the claims in the article?
- After checking a few citations I noticed that the links do work and more importantly the source supports the claims in the article.
Is each fact referenced with an appropriate, reliable reference? Where does the information come from? Are these neutral sources? If biased, is that bias noted?
-I do not think every fact is referenced with an appropriate, reliable reference. Also I believe most are neutral sources.
What kinds of conversations, if any, are going on behind the scenes about how to represent this topic?
-I saw somebody talking about the need to revise this oral tradition article, they stated that the article is extremely long and before more information is added it needs to be revised and broken down to make to more understandable and easy to point out key details.
How is the article rated? Is it a part of any WikiProjects?
- The article is rated on average 1-10 probably like a 5. No it is not part if any Wikiprojects.