Talk:Water extraction: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 19:45, 30 October 2018

	Engineering portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Civil engineering, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Civil engineering on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Civil engineeringWikipedia:WikiProject Civil engineeringTemplate:WikiProject Civil engineeringCE articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Water Unassessed

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Water, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Water supply-related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WaterWikipedia:WikiProject WaterTemplate:WikiProject WaterWater articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Remove last section?

I propose we remove the last few sentences, from "In many parts ..." to "...... Frank Leghorn". These sentences are not relevant, are a bit tendentious, seem to be written for the writer's children ("things which are nasty"), and are scarcely English - the sentence before last ("We use these methods [er ... what methods?] to our benefits and also for the waste which always occur when we take the animals and add them"), in fact, is garbled, ungrammatical and totally incomprehensible. Or do we have a case of vandalism here anyway? Maelli (talk) 05:28, 4 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Extraction vs Abstraction?

Is "water extraction" the same as "water abstraction"? ("water abstraction" redirects to here) If so, can someone please confirm and add a statement to this effect?

@@ Line 5: / Line 5: @@
 I propose we remove the last few sentences, from "In many parts ..." to "...... Frank Leghorn". These sentences are not relevant, are a bit tendentious, seem to be written for the writer's children ("things which are nasty"), and are scarcely English - the sentence before last ("We use these methods [er ... what methods?] to our benefits and also for the waste which always occur when we take the animals and add them"), in fact, is garbled, ungrammatical and totally incomprehensible. Or do we have a case of vandalism here anyway? [[User:Maelli|Maelli]] ([[User talk:Maelli|talk]]) 05:28, 4 May 2016 (UTC)
+== Extraction vs Abstraction? ==
+Is "water extraction" the same as "water abstraction"? ("water abstraction" redirects to here) If so, can someone please confirm and add a statement to this effect?