User talk:PeterTheFourth

Hello! If there's any reason you'd like to contact me, feel equally free to leave me a comment here or wikimail me- I should be able to reply fairly quickly in either case.

Spliting discussion for Brett Kavanaugh Supreme Court nomination

An article that you have been involved with (Brett Kavanaugh Supreme Court nomination) has content that is proposed to be removed and move to another article (Brett Kavanaugh sexual assault allegations). If you are interested, please visit the discussion at the article's talk page. Thank you. Quidster4040 (talk) 23:17, 9 November 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, PeterTheFourth. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

November 2018

Hello, I'm Kendall-K1. I noticed that you made an edit concerning content related to a living (or recently deceased) person on Gavin McInnes, but you didn't support your changes with a citation to a reliable source, so I removed it. Wikipedia has a very strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate and clear. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! Kendall-K1 (talk) 13:33, 22 November 2018 (UTC)

Sock accusation

seems no one had the common decency to inform you of this: 2A02:C7D:2E54:3F00:2DE9:AC2A:78C7:7FEF (talk) 23:15, 30 November 2018 (UTC)

@2A02:C7D:2E54:3F00:2DE9:AC2A:78C7:7FEF: Thanks buckaroo. PeterTheFourth (talk) 23:16, 30 November 2018 (UTC)

CIS

Hey, nothing personal to you. There's just often a situation on the CIS talk page where multiple editors jump in around the same time. Didn't mean to call you out. ModerateMike729 (talk) 20:55, 3 December 2018 (UTC)

Thanks for clarifying. PeterTheFourth (talk) 21:02, 3 December 2018 (UTC)

Tranny activists like you have caused me to hate transgenders.

You people oppress and silence everyone who states biological facts. In my opinion, all you freaks should be rounded up and burned alive. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Chimuaimed (talk • contribs) 00:16, 8 December 2018 (UTC)

Censorship on 'Trans man' article talk page

Hello, you attempted to censor my comment on the trans men talk page yesterday, invalidly premised on the 'NOTAFORUM' policy. This was quite obviously merely an act of censorship of a viewpoint you disagree with, since the comment was on topic and directly in response to a previous on-topic comment, and the talk page is filled with general discussion of the issue of trans men. It was also inappropriate to label my comment 'transphobic', as no fear of trans men was expressed, nor was any hatred or disdain for trans men expressed (though for obvious etymological reasons, I reject this usage of 'x-phobia'; it's merely a dysphemism used as a weapon to silence any dissent from orthodoxy prescribed by certain unusually outspoken activists). The viewpoint I expressed was based entirely on biological facts: trans men do indeed lack male reproductive systems and are incapable of producing male gametes; men, in the sex-specific sense, are male humans; therefore, trans men cannot accurately be described simply as 'men', equivalent to male humans with male reproductive systems. This is neither a new nor 'hateful' theory--it was believed by everyone, forever, until the past few years, and is still believed by the vast majority of people. It is a biological matter, and no hatred or 'phobia' is implied by it.

Though I disagree with your viewpoint, I would never move to censor it in retaliation on spurious grounds. I ask that you treat those who disagree with you the same way. 45.48.238.252 (talk) 01:10, 8 December 2018 (UTC)