User talk:PeterTheFourth

Hello! If there's any reason you'd like to contact me, feel equally free to leave me a comment here or wikimail me- I should be able to reply fairly quickly in either case.

Spliting discussion for Brett Kavanaugh Supreme Court nomination

An article that you have been involved with (Brett Kavanaugh Supreme Court nomination) has content that is proposed to be removed and move to another article (Brett Kavanaugh sexual assault allegations). If you are interested, please visit the discussion at the article's talk page. Thank you. Quidster4040 (talk) 23:17, 9 November 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, PeterTheFourth. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

November 2018

Hello, I'm Kendall-K1. I noticed that you made an edit concerning content related to a living (or recently deceased) person on Gavin McInnes, but you didn't support your changes with a citation to a reliable source, so I removed it. Wikipedia has a very strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate and clear. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! Kendall-K1 (talk) 13:33, 22 November 2018 (UTC)

Sock accusation

seems no one had the common decency to inform you of this: 2A02:C7D:2E54:3F00:2DE9:AC2A:78C7:7FEF (talk) 23:15, 30 November 2018 (UTC)

@2A02:C7D:2E54:3F00:2DE9:AC2A:78C7:7FEF: Thanks buckaroo. PeterTheFourth (talk) 23:16, 30 November 2018 (UTC)

CIS

Hey, nothing personal to you. There's just often a situation on the CIS talk page where multiple editors jump in around the same time. Didn't mean to call you out. ModerateMike729 (talk) 20:55, 3 December 2018 (UTC)

Thanks for clarifying. PeterTheFourth (talk) 21:02, 3 December 2018 (UTC)

Please stop your malicious reversions.

Your reversions of my comment are clearly based on personal animus and dislike of the facts I expressed. If you don't like the Oxford English Dictionary, then take it from Paul McHugh, University Distinguished Professor of Psychiatry at the Johns Hopkins School of Medicine: "First, though, let us address the basic assumption of the contemporary parade: the idea that exchange of one’s sex is possible. It, like the storied Emperor, is starkly, nakedly false.” In that lies their problematic future." Referencing biological reality is not "hate speech". To label my comment as such is nothing more than an attempt to bully someone you disagree with into silence. Did you even read my comment? I was specifically addressing an issue with the meaning of 'heterosexuality' in the context of trans men raised by the article. If you disagree with the point I made, then respond to my point with your reasons, rather than continually trying to censor it. Your reversion is not supported by any Wikipedia policy. --45.48.238.252 (talk) 04:51, 8 December 2018 (UTC)