User talk:Jog1973: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 06:20, 13 November 2006

hi there!

i'd love to see the ones you'd like to point out to me :) JoeSmack ^Talk(p-review!) 05:43, 13 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

see your TALK page Joe

Movaya Wireless

Concerning Movaya Wireless: Wikipedia has a policy concerning articles which qualify for speedy deletion. In particular, Criteria G11 speaks to articles that read like advertising. Articles may be identified and tagged by any editor for speedy deletion. Wikipedia adminstrators will review these articles and may speedily delete them. Portions of the article Movaya Wireless are taken directly from the "About" page of their website (which would also fall under Wikipedia:Copyright problems and would have to be rewritten) and read like ad copy.

I've noticed that another editor has identified the current re-creation of the article as advertising. Please review guidelines on companies. While it may be that Movaya is a notable company, an article that reads like an advertising brochure is not encyclopedic. I recommend that you remove any material copied from the company's website. — ERcheck (talk) 05:51, 13 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

User:jog1973 - I have edited the article to make it simple and factual.

Please note that Wikipedia's policy on verifiable sources. An article on Movaya Wireless should provide verifiable sources to validate its notability. — ERcheck (talk) 06:05, 13 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Also, please note speedy deletion criteria A7 — articles on companies should include information on their notability. — ERcheck (talk) 06:14, 13 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

See WP:CORP for guidelines for inclusion of companies. You may want to consider these guidelines in writing an article on a company. — ERcheck (talk) 06:15, 13 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

If that is the case, then explain the notability and verifiable sources here:

Lastly

Im not trying to be a spammer, or blatantly abuse Wikipedia. I simply think an article on this company is legit, and if the article needs work to become legit in your eyes as an editor, I am willing to work it until it is accepted.

@@ Line 27: / Line 27: @@
 *http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/FreeWave_Technologies
 *http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jasper_Engines_%26_Transmissions
+==Lastly==
+Im not trying to be a spammer, or blatantly abuse Wikipedia. I simply think an article on this company is legit, and if the article needs work to become legit in your eyes as an editor, I am willing to work it until it is accepted.