User talk:JoeSmack: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
==db'd article== |
==db'd article== |
||
from User [[user:jog1973: jog1973]] |
from User [[user:jog1973: jog1973]] |
||
List of company site |
|||
*Why do the editors keep deleting a legitimate company informational page? This article is just like the hundreds of articles written on companies. I would be happy to point them out to you. PLease contact me at my talk page before taking further action [[user_talk:jog1973]] |
|||
| Line 30: | Line 27: | ||
::Ok, godaddy has 14 references. infospace has an article in wired. mediadefender has one in the la times. amy's kitchen reads very [[WP:NPOV|neutral point of view]], very important on wikipedia (see [[WP:5P]]). airimba wireless i sent to [[WP:AFD|article-for-deletion'ed]]....i haven't looked at the others, but maybe you see now a little bit of what constitutes a company article on wikipedia. read [[WP:5P]], [[WP:NPOV]] and [[WP:SPAM]] to make sure it isn't deleted again, and change the article into a good encyclopedic piece that can be kept! :) [[User:JoeSmack|JoeSmack]] <sup>[[User Talk:JoeSmack|Talk]]</sup><small>([[User:JoeSmack/sandbox/peerreview|p-review!]])</small> 06:19, 13 November 2006 (UTC) |
::Ok, godaddy has 14 references. infospace has an article in wired. mediadefender has one in the la times. amy's kitchen reads very [[WP:NPOV|neutral point of view]], very important on wikipedia (see [[WP:5P]]). airimba wireless i sent to [[WP:AFD|article-for-deletion'ed]]....i haven't looked at the others, but maybe you see now a little bit of what constitutes a company article on wikipedia. read [[WP:5P]], [[WP:NPOV]] and [[WP:SPAM]] to make sure it isn't deleted again, and change the article into a good encyclopedic piece that can be kept! :) [[User:JoeSmack|JoeSmack]] <sup>[[User Talk:JoeSmack|Talk]]</sup><small>([[User:JoeSmack/sandbox/peerreview|p-review!]])</small> 06:19, 13 November 2006 (UTC) |
||
: Please review [[Movaya Wireless]] now [[User:Jog1973|Jog1973]] 06:47, 13 November 2006 (UTC) |
|||
I will work on it to make it conform. |
|||
==Earthtimes.org== |
==Earthtimes.org== |
||
Revision as of 06:47, 13 November 2006
 Archive of talk discussion - July 29th, 2004 to June 16th, 2006 Archive of talk discussion - June 17th, 2006 to November 9th, 2006 .... |
db'd article
from User user:jog1973: jog1973
- articles listed here are no different than the one posted on Movaya Wireless; they are all 'marketing pages' any way you look at it. Some companies are bigger then others, some are public, but they ALL promote the company written about. If the article on Movaya Wireless should be deleted because it is seen as spam/advertising, than so should all articles on companies, including the following:
articles here are no different than the one I posted re: company information
- http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/godaddy
- http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/infospace
- http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MediaDefender
- http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Amy%27s_Kitchen
- http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Airimba_Wireless
- http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Citrix
- http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/enom
- http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/FreeWave_Technologies
- http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jasper_Engines_%26_Transmissions
— Preceding unsigned comment added by jog1973 (talk • contribs)
- Ok, godaddy has 14 references. infospace has an article in wired. mediadefender has one in the la times. amy's kitchen reads very neutral point of view, very important on wikipedia (see WP:5P). airimba wireless i sent to article-for-deletion'ed....i haven't looked at the others, but maybe you see now a little bit of what constitutes a company article on wikipedia. read WP:5P, WP:NPOV and WP:SPAM to make sure it isn't deleted again, and change the article into a good encyclopedic piece that can be kept! :) JoeSmack Talk(p-review!) 06:19, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
- Please review Movaya Wireless now Jog1973 06:47, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
Earthtimes.org
Is there any way that I can revert/undo the page? Keekee 05:41, 13 November 2006 (UTC)